User talk:HockSign
Overlinking[edit]
Hellow @HockSign. I am @Archer1234. I have noticed many of your recent edits are adding wikilinks to words, turns, and phrases. Please read WP:OVERLINK, which says, among other things:
Unless a term is particularly relevant to the context in the article, the following are usually not linked:
- Everyday words understood by most readers in context (e.g., education, violence, aircraft, river, animation)
- Common occupations (e.g., accountant, politician, actor)
- The names of subjects with which most readers will be at least somewhat familiar. This generally includes major examples of:
- countries (e.g., Brazil/Brazilian, Canada/Canadian, China/Chinese)
- geographic features (e.g., the Himalayas, Pacific Ocean, South America)
- locations (e.g., New Delhi; New York City, or just New York if the city context is already clear; London, if the context rules out London, Ontario; Southeast Asia)
- languages (e.g., English, Arabic, Korean, Spanish)
- nationalities, ethnicities or descent (e.g., British, Japanese, Turkish, African American, Nigerian)
- religions (e.g., Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism)
Consequently, we do not link words like India, actor, writer, film producer, screenwriter, etc. Some Wikipedia editors, who have continued to overlink despite having been informed about the issue, have had their editing privileges revoked. So, I encourage you to avoid adding overlinking, lest you suffer the same fate. If you have any questions, let me know or ask over at the WP:Teahouse or WP:Help desk, where experienced editors are available to answer questions and provide guidance. Thank you. Happy editing. — Archer (t·c) 08:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
December 2023[edit]
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TechsonNet. Thank you. Jeraxmoira (talk) 11:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 14:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.