User talk:Hr croguy
October 2018
[edit]@BattleshipMan:
Greetings.
I would like to address your recent removal of my update to the Olympus Has Fallen article. I insist that the article is in fact not vandalism whatsoever, and that the statement described in the Olympus Has Fallen Wikipedia article is factually incorrect.
If you were to review the footage of the presidential limo incident, you would notice that a large dark entity falls on the windshield and hood of the presidential limousine with such force to throw the car off course and almost slip it off the bridge. This can be attested by the fact that the presidential limo is typically considerably armored and would require extreme force to be damaged in such a way.
This force was also enough that the First Lady was murdered from the force caused by the impact. At that moment, blood was also spurted on the outside of the windshield, excluding the possibility of an inanimate object. The entity has also not been seen in the establishing shot of the bridge seconds earlier, indicating that it had leaped from the sky on to the limo's hood.
The only explanation for such an action would be a targeted attack by an unnatural entity, and due to the fact that Chupacabra has been claimed to be noticed in the area of the United States including Camp David, as well as the theme of North Koreans conducting practically impossible assaults throughout the movie, it is only logical to conclude that it was a North Korean Chupacabra attacking the presidential limo.
Through this I can only conclude that the wikipedia article in its current state, which claims that the presidential limo lost control due to icy conditions, is factually incorrect and should be fixed to state that a North Korean Chupacabra attacked the presidential limo.
If you insist that what I am stating is falsehood, I would like you to review the footage of the film in your free time and confirm that what I am speaking is true as opposed to what the article states. The timestamp of the event is 00:06:47. I will most likely revert the article to the state of my addition if there is no further reply to this message.
Thank you for your attention. 11:32, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BattleshipMan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. BattleshipMan (talk) 05:18, 9 October 2018 (UTC)