User talk:Htculln38

February 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pure Food and Drug Act has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pure Food and Drug Act was changed by Htculln38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972712 on 2016-02-10T01:58:58+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Chesnaught555. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Loon— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ches (talk) 20:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Loon with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Minneapolis Millers— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm Lazylaces. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Minneapolis Millers— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lazylaces (Talk to me) 19:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dinosaur. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dinosaur was changed by Htculln38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957352 on 2016-03-09T16:23:22+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dinosaur, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —SMALL JIM 16:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]