User talk:HumidHarold

Welcome!

Hello, HumidHarold, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Introduction to referencing
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Atlantic306 (talk) 21:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HumidHarold (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked despite doing nothing wrong. I added an entry to the Dean Norris page about an infamous tweet he made in 2018. I provided references and the entry was entirely neutral. I also added an "Awards section" to the Barnyard game page where I referenced a Youtube video by Tony and Eddy Burback in which they awarded game the "milkiest game of 2006 award". I provided references in this entry as well. While the award may have been comedic in nature, it is a legitimate award going by the commonly understood definition of the word. I do not see how this was vandalization. I am aware that I may have broken a rule in the case of the Dean Norris entry, and I am entirely willing to cease editing that page if that is indeed the case. 

Decline reason:

It doesn't look like the Burback Brothers YouTube channel is notable, so we wouldn't have content from it. Your insistence on adding it looked like an attempt to spam. — Daniel Case (talk) 08:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HumidHarold (talk) 02:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC)