User talk:IHAVEtoeditthisarticle
November 2012
[edit]
Hello, I'm Tomcat7. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Miles Davis because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Tomcat (7) 19:57, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Hey
IHAVEtoeditthisarticle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I must protest. I made one bad edit and now I am blocked from editing? "Vandalism only" is a pretty serious accusation on the grounds that I only vandalized once. If I made a constructive edit as my first edit, would I be heralded as a "constructive-editing only account" and given an award? I would hardly think so. I really find this quite unfair to me. I know I made a bad edit, but it was only once, and it was the only edit that was done. I wasn't even given another chance to contribute to wikipedia, and now I'm gone indefinitely? I think that is jumping the gun a bit early. It's as if you were gearing to use your administrative powers on someone, and waited on myself to make one mistake. All perceived accusations aside, I mean no harm, and do wish to be unblocked and given at least one more chance. Surely a well thought-out and sincere appeal will earn me another chance to contribute. I even apologized on the talk page of the first administrator to send me a warning. The fact that another came in and outright blocked me without giving me a chance is kind of disheartening. IHAVEtoeditthisarticle (talk) 21:38, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It may be the only edit on this account, but you chose to spread the disruption around via multiple accounts. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
IHAVEtoeditthisarticle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Alright, you've got me, but I was serious about editing for the better. As a matter of fact, I have another account doing very constructive edits as we speak (and has been for quite some time), albeit with a far different name than these. I assure you, there will be no disruptive editing on that account. As for these, I should probably feel bad about my year of disruption. I'm sorry you guys have to deal w/ people like me. It looks as though the "i need to edit" legacy comes to an end here, because I am going to leave this in the past, and focus on my other account where good, reliable contributions are made. For the record: I have no idea who "coolkidjoe" is, but I can attest that he/she is not one of my sockpuppet accounts. Not gonna make you take it off or something, but I thought I'd let you know before I quit my bad record for good. Rest assured, I am quite intelligent, so I know when to stop. I'm not just some loser who comes in to make a mess all the time; I actually do good work every so-often, where an article needs it. I have been especially useful where I have done a research paper, and used it's sources to correct the corresponding wikipedia article. You guys are great. Take care. For the record, how do you do italics? IHAVEtoeditthisarticle (talk) 22:15, 26 November 2012 (UTC) IHAVEtoeditthisarticle (talk) 22:31, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have been disruptive through multiple accounts. Even if this account had not been disruptive it would not ever be unblocked because it ia a sockpuppet account. I assume that you are joking about the italics.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
IHAVEtoeditthisarticle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Actually, I was being serious about the italics thing. You seem to be a bit upset about all of this. Again, my apologies. I will not be doing it again :[ But seriously, "coolkidjoe" - not mine. I don't want it. Take it off my sockpuppet list please :[ IHAVEtoeditthisarticle (talk) 22:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This sock account will not be unblocked, and I will shortly revoke your ability to edit this page - your original account should be used if you want to request unblock. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:58, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.