User talk:IKNOWMAIARAWALSH

June 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Maiara Walsh, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Maiara Walsh was changed by IKNOWMAIARAWALSH (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957142 on 2011-06-06T23:49:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:49, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maiara Walsh with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. WikiPuppies! (bark) 23:50, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Maiara Walsh, you may be blocked from editing. WikiPuppies! (bark) 23:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maiara Walsh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WikiPuppies! (bark) 23:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IKNOWMAIARAWALSH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How is editing a page vandalism? You automatically un-edit anyways, so how can it be vandalism? IKNOWMAIARAWALSH (talk) 23:53, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Think about it. 狐 Déan rolla bairille! 00:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.