User talk:IW.HG

If you are here to thank me for reverting vandalism on your page and such, know that thanks will be read and appreciated :), but not necessarily responded too.

If you're here to rant at me, the same probably applies.

Speedy reversion

5 times in a row pages I was about to revert were reverted by you in .5 seconds before me. Wow... Melune (talk) 23:47, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh... Well, I know how irritating that can be sometimes; I am sorry that we had to edit conflict. I use HUGGLE which quickly speeds up reversion of vandalism. I am going to retire for the day in a few minutes so maybe you might get to pump your edit count too :P - Icewedge (talk) 23:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:dubious change

It's vandalism. I Googled it, and Amazon's DVD store has it with just a question mark. Thanks for reverting it! miquonranger03 (talk) 04:47, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I assumed the title of the page should be the same as the subject. Icewedge (talk) 04:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for quickly reverting the vandalism done to my userpage and talk page. DiverseMentality^(Boo!) 07:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome, I was glad to do it (I am feeding my editcountitis tonight :)! Icewedge (talk) 07:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As am I. I think warnings are not needed as the user openly admits to sock puppetry. I've already added the current username here: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/HiNancyHowsTheNight. DiverseMentality^(Boo!) 07:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes. You are correct, I think it is a better course of action to report them to AIV as vandalism only accounts though, as that will get acted upon quicker than SSP. Icewedge (talk) 07:44, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be blocked now, but I'll be on guard with more sock puppets and will report them to AIV for next time. DiverseMentality^(Boo!) 07:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert to my page as well! DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:47, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Icewedge (talk) 22:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me, too. Just piling on... -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yay!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For beating me in reverting practically all vandalism I see. Nice job mate! :) Razor ICE 08:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the barnstar! I really appreciate it :) Icewedge (talk) 22:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the vandalism revert on my user page, I appreciate it. The Dominator^Talk_Edits 05:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, glad to do it! Icewedge (talk) 05:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

revert

Yes, I know. Greasemonkey is having problems and censored words (I reverted the censors and then you reverted the edit I made that fixed the problem).

Oh, and for humor qualities:

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.240.15 (talk • contribs)

Oh yes, I see, my mistake. I just saw your addition of the word 'gay' and 'hell' in a half a dozen places and assumed it was vandalism; next time specify an edit summary. IHG (talk) 19:43, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

lol. I was reverting another edit, but didn't notice the content of the page would cause greasemonkey to go on a rampage. Thus having to add all those words back. 24.18.240.159 (talk) 19:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...

... for reverting the vandalism of my User and Talk pages. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 02:04, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DUDEDUDEDUDE!!!!!!!!!!

Awesome name. Userbox creator? lifebaka++ 01:29, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I am rather pleased with the name myself :) The userbox was created for me by Pedro. IHG (talk) 01:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why

im simply having a discussion —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carrotsandpotatoes (talk • contribs) 02:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No,you're clogging pages with ASCII pictures. Please stop. Acroterion _(talk) 02:26, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I should probably not have labeled your edit as plain vandalism Carrotsandpotatoes, but it is rather disruptive, as Acroterion said. Icewedge (talk) 02:33, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Hi IcewedgeHugglesGoats!, Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page! «l\| Ψrometheăn ™\|l» (talk) 04:07, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to do it, I am sorry you had to come under attack by the trolls. Thanks for the barnstar! Icewedge (talk) 04:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dont be sorry, its part of te job and reminds me why I do it :) Besides, it happens at least 40 times a day. «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 07:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops!

Sorry about stepping on your revert to the Puppy article. Concurrent edit conflicts are fun. :) Kameron (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism reversal

Please always check the recent article history when reverting a vandal. Often there are several anon IP vandals, also some well-meaning anons may delete only a piece of previous vandalism since they probably don't know how to check article history. Finally, there are tricky vandals (or wikipedia stress-testers) known which use two accounts: one vandalizes, another writes "rvv" but does not actually completely revert. `'Míkka >t 22:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken. Icewedge (talk) 05:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my page. I appreciate it! Maxis ftw (talk) 04:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey thanks for reverting vandalism on my page. -Killiondude (talk) 08:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks so much for reverting the vandalism on my page ;) I truly appreciate it! BlackPearl14 ^[talkies!^•^contribs!] 21:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

You have deleted some actual, yet possibly mythical information I posted. I think that users of Wikipedia may be interested by the information I provided. It is helpful to learn about myths and stories related to a topic. If you re-post my contribution it would be greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.240.124.45 (talk • contribs)

No, I won't restore the information because I strongly suspect that it was just made up. For a start 'Tessa' does not seem a particularly Chinese name and I am unable to find any mention of this anywhere else, if you could give a source to verify your information then maybe. Given your past edit history (which includes addition of other very dubious information) I can't say I place a lot of stock in your word. IHG (talk) 03:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the vandal rv on my user page! Peter Fleet (talk) 20:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me, too, except it was on my talk page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:29, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be reverted if you please

I don't know if this is how this is supposed to work, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Best_Christmas_Pageant_Ever has been vandalized. Firenoodle (talk) 22:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has been undone now, kudos to the reverter Proofreader77 (talk · contribs). In the future if you come across feel free to revert it yourself. This can be done by clicking the tab at the top of a page that says "history" which will bring you to the page revision log. At the page revision log you will see a list of edits which have been done to the page. This is an excerpt from the history of The_Best_Christmas_Pageant_Ever (without links):

(cur) (last)  22:53, 18 December 2008 Proofreader77 (Talk | contribs) m (2,865 bytes) (Reverted edits by 74.226.207.26 to last version by 67.190.212.13 (HG)) (rollback | undo)
(cur) (last) 22:42, 18 December 2008 74.226.207.26 (Talk) (37 bytes) (←Replaced content with 'They are all sex addicts so are yu=ou') (undo)
(cur) (last) 22:41, 18 December 2008 74.226.207.26 (Talk) (2,782 bytes) (undo)
(cur) (last) 20:15, 16 December 2008 67.190.212.13 (Talk) (2,865 bytes) (→Characters) (undo)
(cur) (last) 20:14, 16 December 2008 67.190.212.13 (Talk) (2,861 bytes) (→Characters) (undo)
(cur) (last) 01:48, 15 December 2008 150.201.52.201 (Talk) (2,865 bytes) (undo)
(cur) (last) 01:47, 15 December 2008 150.201.52.201 (Talk) (2,883 bytes) (undo)
(cur) (last) 22:49, 14 December 2008 67.81.143.241 (Talk) (2,897 bytes) (undo)

To see what the editor did click the link that says "last", to undo the editors change click the link that says "undo", which will lead you to a save page dialog, then click "save page". For more help and explanation see WP:HISTORY and WP:UNDO. Icewedge (talk) 02:46, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Sorry about the warning we reverted at the same time and Huggle must of tagged you instead of the IP. Kyle1278 03:16, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries :) I've done that before too. Icewedge (talk) 03:16, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I appreciate the help here. I wasn't familiar with this sig and thought you were new on the scene. I was all set to give you a hearty pep talk and such....lol...Imagine my surprise :) Tiderolls 00:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Its been a while since I did vandal-fighting, kinda fun to get back in the swing of things. Its good you thinking about encourage a new user though! I think that kind of thing needs to happen more often. Now, the real question, about them muffins.... Icewedge (talk) 01:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HA! Tiderolls 01:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fastest Production Car?

Sorry - don't understand your message. FYI, I did not contribute to the "Fastest Production Car" article, so I can only assume that either this is a mistake or someone has hacked my account. Dunks (talk) 04:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]