User talk:I don't know enough about the clippers' collapse

This account (I don't know enough about the clippers' collapse) is a doppelgänger account created by Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, an established user, to prevent impersonation by vandals. Please see their talk page for relevant discussion. You can also view I don't know enough about the clippers' collapse's edit count by clicking here.

Administrators: Please notify Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum when taking any action on this account, or any related user pages.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, I don't know enough about the clippers' collapse, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as I don't know enough about the clippers' collapse, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sunmist3 (talk) 04:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of I don't know enough about the clippers' collapse[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as I don't know enough about the clippers' collapse, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sunmist3 (talk) 04:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Church. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Los Angeles Clippers— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Church ^Talk 04:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Church ^Talk 04:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to I don't know enough about the clippers' collapse. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Ilyushka88 | ^Talk! _Contribs 04:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum. Church ^Talk 04:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Church ^Talk 04:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To NeilN[edit]

@NeilN: I am Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum (talk · contribs) tag my page as the sock of it. Question do you have Ebola? --I don't know enough about the clippers' collapse (talk) 04:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC) I don't know enough about the clippers' collapse (talk) 04:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]