User talk:Icodense99/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Gulaschkanone99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Gap9551 (talk) 16:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Larisa Kronberg) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Larisa Kronberg.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Fascinating article - would love to see an infobox?

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Britishfinance: Thanks for reviewing. I added an infobox to the page. I'm not accustomed to using infoboxes, since this is unusual in German Wikipedia. Best regards, Icodense (talk) 23:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at User talk:Johannes Maximilian. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Nyttend (talk) 11:00, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Icodense99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is ridiculous. I just deleted continued harassment as the page owner didn't want M-J's edits on his talk page.

Accept reason:

Seeing the comments below from Johannes, I feel this block can be lifted. If I can advised though, leave the edits there as is and let Johannes remove them, just to prevent this from occurring again. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nyttend There must be some sort of misunderstanding. I had asked editor M-J to stay off my talk page, because they were harassing me. But they ignored it and kept posting insultive messages. Icodense99 had my permission to remove M-J's edits. If he had not done that, I would have done it myself. Please unblock him. Thank you. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:50, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Icodense if I can reiterate, it might be best for the moment to stay from Johannes' talk page. Feel free to edit Wikipedia elsewhere though, just don't want to see this get out of hand for you. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:03, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Icodense (talk) 12:04, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eryk from Team Djooky

Hello. We request you to stop the vandalism of the changes you have made about our Ukraine representative. it is also this year's favorite. Web integration has not been provided yet. You may not be able to find sources. We are in the process of editing our drafts. If Web integration is provided, news sources will appear. We follow the issue meticulously with our friends from the Wikipedia team. good work! Egorku56 (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop spamming your blatantly irrelevant promotion into Wikipedia, you won't succeed. Thanks, --Icodense (talk) 12:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tagging

You tagged Softgarden as WP:G11 but you did not notify the creator of the article. That is required. Please do not tag articles unless you comply with policy. I declined the G11.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:18, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already requested several speedy deletions here on cross-wiki-spam and never did this to this day. Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion doesn't mention that it would be required (it says should be, not has to). Thanks for making it more difficult to get rid of cross-wiki-spam (dewiki and frwiki executed my request for speedy deletion on the same article much faster and less complicated...) --Icodense (talk) 17:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Once a speedy tag has been removed, you may not retag it. You'll have to use a different deletion process. I reverted your G11 of the Softgarden article.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: That is also not mentioned on Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, seems like a made up rule again. What's the point in this? Why am I not allowed to retag it, just because I didn't know some obsure rule, which isn't even there on the page about speedy deletions? Why do you make it so complicated to get cross-wiki spam deleted? At this point, I don't know how to proceed. --Icodense (talk) 17:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really upset about your very unhelpful behaviour. If this cross-wiki spam doesn't get a speedy deletion tag again soon, I'll search for a way to complain about you, I don't think sysops should act this way. --Icodense (talk) 17:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Both of these concepts are noted in the policy. I told you how to proceed: "use a different deletion process", e.g., nominate it for WP:AfD. If you persist in flouting policy, though, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: No, it isn't noted. As I already said, that isn't mentioned in the policy: Users nominating a page for speedy deletion should specify which criterion/criteria the page meets, and should notify the page creator and any major contributors. The G11 template itself also says: Nominator: Please consider placing the template. There is nowhere anything to be found that this would be strictly required. Also I can't find anything that it would be forbidden to retag a page when the request only got declined for a formal reason (which isn't even valid in my opinion). I don't think it is acceptable that I have to search for a more complicated way to get this article deleted just because I didn't follow a rule I couldn't even know about (because it doesn't exist). I also don't think that threatening a block is a constructive way to communicate. --Icodense (talk) 17:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]