User talk:IlyaV

Welcome!

Uniqueness theorem

Last time I promised you a shiny new page for uniquess theorem (mathematical) but later I found it beyond my capacity and lost interest in editing Wikipedia.Sorry for that.

Today I reread Uniqueness theorem.Then I found a mistake.You write

"Using the identity

${\displaystyle \mathbf {\nabla } \cdot (\phi \epsilon \mathbf {\nabla } \phi )=\epsilon (\mathbf {\nabla } \phi )^{2}+\mathbf {\nabla } \cdot (\epsilon \mathbf {\nabla } \phi )}$"

But in fact,it should be

${\displaystyle \nabla \cdot (\phi \epsilon \nabla \phi )=\epsilon {{(\nabla \phi )}^{2}}+\phi \nabla \cdot (\epsilon \nabla \phi )}$

In fact,I want to continue talking about the "outermost surface integral" stuff,but let's settle down this issue first.--Netheril96 (talk) 04:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

I thought again and found that I was wrong with the "outermost surface integral" stuff.--Netheril96 (talk) 05:42, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

You're absolutely right! Thanks for the correction. Again, if you want to expand upon the uniqueness theorem article, please do so! IlyaV (talk) 00:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Ginsberg

I've completed this nomination, which can be found at the link above. If you like, you can go and expand on your rationale (which I took from your edit summary), and explain in more detail why the article should be deleted. Best, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 21:56, 3 March 2015 (UTC)