User talk:Infomonk16

February 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sarah Taylor (cricketer) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sarah Taylor (cricketer) was changed by Infomonk16 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869133 on 2023-02-23T20:37:47+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Joseph2302. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to 2023 ICC Women's T20 World Cup have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:51, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Infomonk16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

HI, I see that I am blocked by you without any clear reason. Whatever I have wrote or edit are backed by internet sources and rationality. None of my Edits are in bad taste or to malign. Then why I have been blocked without any waring or notice.

Regards

Infomonk16 Infomonk16 (talk) 04:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for a very clear reason, stated in the block notice. You were given two warnings, they are on this very page. If you are not advertising or spamming, please describe what you were doing as well as any connection you have to the subjects of your edits. 331dot (talk) 09:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

First of all I was not spamming at all. All the Edits I made were relevant to the pages. All of them were written in a very professional and decent language. In fact I still fail to understand why those edits were reverted. Th reason mentioned were also not ver clear. for e.g I edited the Sarah Taylor's page and added that "she openly admit on her twitter timeline that she is lesbian and her partner is pregnant". Now can you explain me what is the SPAM here, didn't she gave that update on her time line. Another example is of Ramiz Raja's page. I just mentioned that he was sacked from PCB chairmanship in in unwelcome way. He himself said that in his statement, he even said that "he was not allowed to pic his stuff from the office". He also said on a private TV channel that Shoaib Akhtar need to have at least a graduate degree to be eligible for PCB Chairmanship post. Now may I know what exactly was SPAM in it? My account is blocked without explaining what exactly was SPAM in it. I am ready to back my each EDITS with proper proof over internet. JUST SHARE THE STATEMENT WHICH YOU THINK WAS A SPAM and I will share the proper sources of the news.