User talk:Ingardot

Welcome

Hello, Ingardot, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:24, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Re: Orchid (album)

Please stop adding lead/rhythm guitar to Orchid (album). Saying that both members play both lead and rhythm guitar is unnecessary and redundant – if both members play both positions, then just say "guitars". I have explained this to you already. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 04:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Motaros (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 15:08, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ingardot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Are you serious? I'm getting blocked all for a user name switch that I didn't really know about? You should block Nymfm or whatever that persons name is for removing my great edits and tons of work destroyed by that user which hurts the site and other people who'd like to learn from this site. I have been on this site for years and I apologize I'm not master of this site. My edits is going to be chosen over a misunderstanding towards user names? Give me this one so I can stick to it because it's become more clear than ever to not change user names. I'm not even getting a chance to be off this site for 6 months in order to come back. I'm not getting any fair chances. Its like, I screwed up on chance and that's it. Ridiculous, if I don't get a chance than at least I would like this message across even though there's people out there who don't care. Ingardot (talk) 22:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

After several years of sockpuppetry and a dozen or so blocks for it You innocent routine is a bit hard to swallow. If you still don't understand what it is you have been doing wrong there is even less reason to even consider unblocking you. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

continued

Well, Beeblebrox (even though I'm trying to respond to you and hope that you see this and others) that was a less harsh response I've gotten before. I'm not trying to be innocent here. I made tons of mistakes (like other humans) and this is not me trying to persuade to being unblock although that would be great and at least get a consideration but by doing multiple sock puppetry but what else could do other than sorry? How can I help to repay for all that? I thought I would repay back with good edits. Nobody wants to hear my sorrys. That's ok I'm not looking for sympathy (even while saying that).Ingardot (talk) 06:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, your edits haven't been very good. Despite years of explanations on how to better edit articles (from myself and other editors), you continue to make the same substandard edits you've always made. You generally don't make those edits on articles in my watchlist any more, but you've made them to other articles I don't watch (for example, looking at your user contributions, you still collapse track listings that don't need to be collapsed [1], despite my linking to guidelines stating this is unnecessary). Also your repeated attempts to add unnecessary, redundant information to Orchid (album).

If you had shown the ability to grow as an editor, you probably wouldn't be banned right now. As it is, this is less to do with you changing usernames (although that is a big problem) and more to do with the fact that your edits aren't good enough for Wikipedia, and aren't likely to become so any time soon. This is why you are banned from Wikipedia, not just any one username. Perhaps you could find another wiki online, for Swedish death metal bands or for MMA fighters, and edit that? Most unofficial wikis aren't overly concerned with guidelines and policies like Wikipedia is. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 14:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I feel that is wrong. My edits have CORRECT info directly from official sites. I'm also against redundancy so I duno wat ur talking about. Collapsed trax were just for the page space and since there are multiple issues of an album the page would go on and on but since wiki policies are so strict towards things like that it's insane as it is just an edit. Plus I did follow things like bring up issues on talk pages.Ingardot (talk) 18:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MMA

Thanks for helping to make MMA articles on wikipedia better! In September 168 people made a total of 956 edits to MMA articles. I noticed you havn't listed yourself on the WikiProject Mixed martial arts Participants page. Take a look, sign up, and don't forget to say hi on the talk page. Kevlar (talk) 03:48, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well thats what I've been trying to say in the past that my edits are not that bad and if I can get help to come back on here would be great but there's others out there who will always disagree.--Ingardot (talk) 18:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]