User talk:Isabelhelm

Welcome!

Hi Isabelhelm! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! DanCherek (talk) 00:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have inserted Creative Commons licensed text into Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Multiple site entry technique. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly-licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 00:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multiple site entry technique has been accepted

Multiple site entry technique, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 04:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seriousness check has been accepted

Seriousness check, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 13:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warm-up technique (April 6)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I have read the Reips articles cited in this draft, and they don't contain the word "warm-up technique", i. e. if this was a mainspace article, I would tag all of its text with the failed verification template according to WP:FAILV. Therefore, it is warranted to believe that this draft's topic is contrary to WP:NOR and thus contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, because this draft is an attempt at establishing the term "warm-up technique"; id est it describes what "warm-up technique" could be according to its Wikipedia author, but since the term has not yet been established in reliable sources, this draft cannot describe what "warm-up technique" is. Considering that, in general, "warm-up techniques" are more or less ubiquitous, it is very obvious why this all fails – there are just too many obvious, and well-known warm-up techniques that simply have nothing to do with what this draft is about. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Isabelhelm! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Warm-up technique

Hello, Isabelhelm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Warm-up technique, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Warm-up technique

Hello, Isabelhelm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Warm-up technique".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)