User talk:Ithkuil
Formal mediation has been requested[edit]
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "WebGL". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by July 4, 2011.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 10:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected[edit]
The request for formal mediation concerning WebGL, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 00:11, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MEAN (software stack).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! QuantifiedElf (talk) 21:33, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MEAN (software stack), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MEAN (software stack)[edit]
Hello Ithkuil. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "MEAN (software stack)".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MEAN (software stack)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
re Nimrod programming language[edit]
Hello. My name is Jason Livesay. You previously deleted the article on the excellent Nimrod programming language. Since that time, the Nimrod community has grown, the language and tools have gotten more mature, and the notability of this language is now undeniable.
In fact, after researching new systems programming languages over the last month, I have come to the conclusion that Nimrod is objectively superior to Go, Rust, D and Julia as a general purpose systems and application programming language, as it has superior performance, syntax, and metaprogramming capabilities when compared to any of those languages. However, it is not quite as popular as those languages. One of the reasons for that is the deletion of the Wikipedia article.
The latest discussion on Hacker News: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7388014
There is a large community on irc on freenode as well as a busy forum, a home page, a manual, etc. Not only is this a "real" and notable programming language, it is amazing that it has not been recognized as such by the Wikipedia editors. Perhaps this is simply due to a lack of depth of understanding of high technology that is causing this inability to recognize Nimrod.
Please see the following article which has been prepared by a core Nimrod developer (who doesn't actually know me or know that I am advocating for his article) and includes numerous references: