User talk:Its.anewday2b

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Jackie Evancho has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jackie Evancho was changed by Its.anewday2b (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.948622 on 2014-01-26T13:56:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:56, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jackie Evancho with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 13:58, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jackie Evancho with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 14:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:No legal threats

Your edit here claims you are not threatening legal action but you are employing the threat of law enforcement involvement in an attempt to intimidate editors. There are ways to address legitimate concerns. Please post your concerns to the article talk page and your complaints will be addressed within the policies and guidelines of this project. I will watchlist this page in the event you have any questions. Regards Tiderolls 14:50, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you are jeopardizing your editing privilege by edit warring (see WP:Edit warring) at Jackie Evancho. You need to self revert your last edit so as to avoid a block on this account. How can you accomplish your goal if you are blocked?Tiderolls 14:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Tiderolls 15:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was explained to you, more than once, that your editing was disruptive and that you had a course of action for legitimate concerns. You have convinced me that you will continue edit warring to obtain your preferred version of the article rather than follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. As before, I am watchlisting this page in the event you have any questions. Tiderolls 15:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your concerns

If you are still reading here, please let me know so that I can discuss and seek to address the concerns you raised about one of our articles. Thank you. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2nd gold certification

I see that you made an edit to state that there is a 2nd gold certification. Are you referring to the fact that OHN was also certified gold, or something else? I added a clarification about the former in a footnote in two places in the article. If you mean that there's a new certification, can you please point us to a link to the announcement, or a news article about it? Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 12:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]