User talk:Iwearsox21

2007 edits

The article Trevor mclenithan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. See Wikipedia:Verifiability. NawlinWiki 15:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bennington, Vermont, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bennington, Vermont was changed by Iwearsox21 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2007-10-16T14:04:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 14:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Academic dishonesty, you will be blocked from editing. --Lquilter (talk) 18:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Protein has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO ^Hail! 13:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Thoughts on the Education of Daughters constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 14:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kiwi. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 14:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kiwi. Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 14:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Cody Pettibone

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Cody Pettibone, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Cody Pettibone seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Cody Pettibone, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cody Pettibone

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cody Pettibone, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Fabrictramp (talk) 14:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

As your account had no contributions that were not vandalism, blanking, or hoaxes, I have blocked it indefinitely. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 14:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]