User talk:JBSHC4

Ways to improve David Lynn (pastor)

Hi, I'm Cornellier. JBSHC4, thanks for creating David Lynn (pastor)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please try to explain how David Lynn is of interest to the world. Please try to place the subject in the wider scheme of things, and give insight into the points of view of others mentioned in the article. Let me know if you need a hand.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Cornellier (talk) 04:19, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Lynn (pastor)

The article David Lynn (pastor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Blatantly promotional piece for a non-notable dude.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Lynn (pastor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Lynn (pastor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lynn (pastor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Hurry

The article John Hurry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a resume; fails WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]