User talk:JJ1013

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Prody Parrot has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Prody Parrot was changed by JJ1013 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957393 on 2017-04-01T15:59:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Prody Parrot has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Prody Parrot was changed by JJ1013 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852245 on 2017-04-16T21:54:24+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello JJ1013, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Prody Parrot have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 22:18, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed this material again. It appears to be to be nothing but a verbatim copy of the online responses. It does not add anything useful to the article. Please stop adding this material. Discuss it on the article's talk page. Meters (talk) 23:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Prody Parrot. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 23:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've been undone five times now. Whether or not this would be considered copyvio, the material just does not seem appropriate for the article. And the YouTube link you added as a ref has possible copyright concerns too. If the person who posted the YouTube video is violating copyright we cannot even link to the video. I'm not sure that a screen copy of running program is a copyright violation, but it doesn't matter since I don't think the material should be in the article at all. Meters (talk) 23:59, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]