User talk:Jaagit

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaagit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a new account but I am not a new user. My previous account name was Bane143 and I forgot the password as it's been long time since I used my account. I should have mentioned my previous account on the user page but honestly forgot. I am sorry for it. When scrolling through some pages that I edited, I came across these suspects who I believe are all the same. That is why I created this new account and submitted a sockpuppetry investigation on these suspected accounts. Please unblock my account as I am not a sock of HaughtonBrit and I will continue to use this account moving forward. If someone can help, please forward my old account Bane143 to this new account please. Jaagit (talk) 08:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; no admin has found this request satisfactory in over two months. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:11, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pinging @RoySmith: Jaagit (talk) 09:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible to Kelownatopdog but this is not a strong technical correlation. --Yamla (talk) 11:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I would call them likely to Kelownatopdog. And even if the above story is true, the SPI filing doesn't seem like something a user with Bane143's level of experience would be doing. RoySmith (talk) 13:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: and @RoySmith: my account was only Bane143. I am not sock of Kelowna either. It’s not rocket science to be able to submit a SPI, when you take note of how it’s done by other users. I have also been navigating through Wikipedia since my last edit in 2021 and noted all the dramas, disruptions and vandalisms. This also builds experience. I am truly Bane143 and I request you to kindly unblock me. Jaagit (talk) 17:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fairly certain that this is HaughtonBrit who may be in Canada right now, as he traveled there to edit last year [1]. I find it very hard to believe that this is Kelownatopdog, given that Kelowna has never made an unblock request with any of his accounts. This kind of desperateness and deception is highly indicative of HaughtonBrit's work. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 08:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My account is not some sock account and please do not talk about desperate need and deception with your history of sock accounts such as where you pretended to be female named Aleena or a Muslim named Akbarthegreatest. Bane143 is my only account. Jaagit (talk) 10:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ironic, considering your most prominent account was called "MehmoodS", which last I recalled, was a Muslim name. At least I never went as far as impersonating an admin [2]. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 10:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Impersonating a female is as far as you can go. Who is meh mood now? Why are you connecting me to this user now? Are you cherry picking anyone to connect me to? Unlike you I only had one account. Jaagit (talk) 10:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is Bane143. Jaagit (talk) 10:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well good luck with your unblock requests. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 10:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]