User talk:Jack Beda

Jack Beda, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jack Beda! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lykkeland (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lykkeland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lykkeland, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lykkeland

Hello, Jack Beda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lykkeland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lykkeland

Hello, Jack Beda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lykkeland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Thanks for you fixes to Helmholtz equation. You marked these as "minor edits" but in my experience most Wikipedia edits are even more "minor". According to my understanding "minor" is really for things that do not change the meaning of the text, eg "tha" -> "the". Your (correct) qualification of the relationship between Helmholtz and Schrodinger eqn changes meaning so I would encourage you not to mark such edits as minor. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your reply. This is wildly useful to me. I will certainnly do so in future. Unfortunately I am a real noob when it comes to this, so I apologise my trial and error learning has cost you some time. Jack Beda (talk) 16:07, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! Keep up your trials and don't sweat any errors ;-) Johnjbarton (talk) 16:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multiple Polylogarithm (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

arXiv is an open-access so need to show papers were published in a reputable peer-reviewed journal. Also publications by the same author generally count as a single source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Multiple Polylogarithm and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]