Jump to content

User talk:Jackus2008

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Jackus2008, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome Escaper27 19:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:7. Hose Layer Unit.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 20:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:LFB Command Unit.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 20:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:LFB Breathing Apparatus Unit.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 20:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:LFB Damage Control Unit.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 20:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:USAR Building Collapse Rescue.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 21:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:USAR Disaster Recovery Module.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 21:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:High Volume Pump.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 21:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:4. Turntable Ladder.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 21:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:18. Timber Carrier.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 21:09, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:2. Fire Rescue Unit.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 21:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:3. Aerial Ladder Platform.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 21:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Incident Response Unit.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 21:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:LFB Fire Investigation Dog.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:21. Fire Investigation Dog.jpg. The copy called Image:21. Fire Investigation Dog.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 21:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:LFB DPL Mark 2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 21:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:10. Fire Investigation Unit.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 21:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:12. Scientific Support Unit.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 21:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:LFB Fire Investigation Dog.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oysterguitarist 21:53, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of ECFRS Hose Layer Unit

[edit]

A tag has been placed on ECFRS Hose Layer Unit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kkmurray (talk) 01:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of ECFRS Rescue Tender

[edit]

A tag has been placed on ECFRS Rescue Tender requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kkmurray (talk) 01:17, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Fire Investigation Dog Unit (London Fire Brigade)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Fire Investigation Dog Unit (London Fire Brigade) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kkmurray (talk) 01:18, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Scientific Support Unit (London Fire Brigade)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Scientific Support Unit (London Fire Brigade) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kkmurray (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Dual Purpose Ladder (London Fire Brigade)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dual Purpose Ladder (London Fire Brigade) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kkmurray (talk) 01:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Breathing Apparatus Unit (London Fire Brigade)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Breathing Apparatus Unit (London Fire Brigade) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kkmurray (talk) 01:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Command Unit (London Fire Brigade)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Command Unit (London Fire Brigade) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kkmurray (talk) 01:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Fire Rescue Unit (London Fire Brigade)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Fire Rescue Unit (London Fire Brigade) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kkmurray (talk) 01:25, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

London Fire Brigade

[edit]

Why not include the above stubs in the London Fire Brigade article? Also, you can upload your images to the commons (e.g. Commons:Fire engine, etc.). --Kkmurray (talk) 01:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As an admin working the CSD backlog, I started responding to the speedy tags on your stubs. Rather than delete them, I've instead combined them into the article London Fire Brigade equipment. I did it this way instead of putting them into the LFB article, because that article is so long. Please continue to work on them there. It is generally a better idea to combine similar items like this instead of created a set of fragmented stubs. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 01:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Essex County Fire and Rescue Service appliances

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Essex County Fire and Rescue Service appliances requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Willirennen (talk) 01:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Circumcision picture

[edit]

Hi. I see you added a picture to Circumcision. Someone reverted it as "possible vandalism". Maybe they were mistaken; maybe the image was appropriate. You could discuss it at Talk:Circumcision. If you're uploading an image you're usually supposed to upload it to commons commons:Main Page and you have to provide copyright information: for example if you took the picture yourself you have to say so and declare something about its copyright -- there are instructions somewhere, the rules are very strict. (Maybe sometimes you're supposed to upload the image to Wikipedia. I'm not sure what the rules are. See Help:Images.) When the image is in commons it's easy to display it on a wikipedia page. I hope this helps. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. --Coppertwig (talk) 02:41, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WTC 2nd attack.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:WTC 2nd attack.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:BTP_Police_truck.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BTP_Police_truck.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 22:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Essex,_England,_fire_engine.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Essex,_England,_fire_engine.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 23:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Essex_appliances.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Essex_appliances.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 23:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:USAR_Timber_Carrier.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:USAR_Timber_Carrier.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 01:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:USAR_1.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:USAR_1.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 01:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

You've been warned repeatedly about uploading images without proper licensing. Please stop for a moment, familiarize yourself with how to do this properly. If you disregard our policies and continue in this way, your account may be blocked. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 01:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)![reply]

Have a look at the welcome template at the top of this page for more information about writing, editing and submitting pictures to Wikipedia. Regards. Escaper27 19:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image thumbnail sizes

[edit]

Please do not add pixel sizes to image thumbnails in the article; doing so disables the user perferences feature of wikipedia. Thanks. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 06:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You Tube LINKS..

[edit]

Please do NOT just re-insert links to material whose status was doubted. If you wish to discuss or object to the removal please use the talk page for the article concerned.

Linking to material of un-verfied copyright status is not in the spirit of Wikipedia and can create legal risks for the project.

Should you have evidence to support linkage to material on sites like You Tube, please provide this on the talk page for the article concerned, or in edit summaries when adding the links.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Zidane sent off.JPG

[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Zidane sent off.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 09:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account block notice

[edit]

You have continued to upload images of questionable copyright status despite being asked to stop. Therefore, I regret to inform you that you are blocked from this site for 11 days in order to protect the project. When the block expires, you will be able to upload and contribute again, but if you upload further images, you must comply with the image use policy, copyright policy, and, where appropriate, non-free content criteria. In particular, you must not claim that you created an image yourself, it is all your own work, and you release it to the public domain if that is not true. Stifle (talk) 09:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:London 3.jpg

[edit]

Please note that the image Image:London 3.jpg that you uploaded on 19 January 2008 is a copy of an image on Wikipedia Commons Image:Canary-wharf-one.jpg uploaded in 2007. This image has a different licence and attributes the image to a different source. If you are the copyright holder than you need to go to Wikipedia Commons and claim your rights over the image. If you are not the copyright holder, and I note that you have already been warned and blocked for uploading and claiming copyright then please desist from uploading questionable images. Thank you MilborneOne (talk) 16:43, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

[edit]
[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Fire engines crash on 999 call.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1075/1127702568_b7a120dd49.jpg?v=0. As a copyright violation, Image:Fire engines crash on 999 call.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Fire engines crash on 999 call.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Fire engines crash on 999 call.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Fire engines crash on 999 call.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Fire engines crash on 999 call.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 16:56, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Taipei.jpg

[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Taipei.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC) --Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:LFB Pump Ladder.jpg

[edit]

File:LFB Pump Ladder.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:LFB Pump Ladder.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:LFB Pump Ladder.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:49, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jackus2008&oldid=1090524556"