Jump to content

User talk:Jacob Lundberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Jacob Lundberg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! TheRetroGuy (talk) 21:09, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How not to undelete an article.

[edit]

Calling the deleting admin "ignorant" is a good way to be ignored. Saying that you don't have time to either find the correct venue for undeletion or participate in a "lengthy discussion" on the subject is another way. I've asked Chrislk02 to reconsider the grounds for deletion, but if they don't, your only other available path is to take the time to make the case for the article without insulting other editors.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Jacob Lundberg! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 408 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Per Schlingmann - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom notice: 1953 Iranian coup POV

[edit]

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#1953 Iranian coup POV and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, Binksternet (talk) 16:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Swedish organizations by number of members has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 13:54, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish Free Enterprise Foundation listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Swedish Free Enterprise Foundation. Since you had some involvement with the Swedish Free Enterprise Foundation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 04:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Swedish organizations by number of members is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Swedish organizations by number of members until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Triptothecottage (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]