User talk:Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco/Archives/2023

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Nomination of Edmon L. Gallagher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edmon L. Gallagher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmon L. Gallagher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 00:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Please check your quotation

Hi Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco
In this edit, you included the misspelling "renowed" in a quotation - as I cannot check the original, could you please check it and either correct it, or, if the mistake is in the original, add [sic] after the misspelled word - many thanks - Arjayay (talk) 20:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Done. Thank you very much user Arjayay! It was a typo of mine. Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

I have removed the quote. In the quote, Andrews gives a summary of what other scholars have said about the NWT, whereas it would be better to cite those authors' own reviews and only provide Andrews' own comments about the NWT, unless Andrews' comment were used as a direct rebuttal to those other reviewers' statements rather than a standalone quote. Separately, it may be misleading to suggest there are only 'a few Trinity verses' out of '31, 102 verses' where a significant doctrinal position is the focus of the few verses (though that is not actually the only criticism of the NWT). Significantly altering a fundamental property of a main character is not invalidated by the number of words or verses in the entire text.--Jeffro77 (talk) 05:15, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hello, I'm Cordless Larry. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ilaria Ramelli, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Ilaria Ramelli, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)