User talk:Jaldhi j

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jaldhi j. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Ragi Jani, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It seems you are their son? TLA^tlak 07:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hey, I am his son and working as a pr for him also. I have attached all the reliable sources from the different publisher. kindly consider those please. this page is genuine and please consider these all details correct. if you want anything please let me know. Jaldhi j (talk) 07:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

could you pls tell me how can I disclose my COI? Jaldhi j (talk) 07:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Place the following on your User page (User:Jaldhi j): {{UserboxCOI|Ragi Jani}}. S0091 (talk) 17:46, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ragi Jani (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Times of India is a weak source because they engage in paid promotion (see WP:TOI). Other sources are interviews or brief mentions with a couple of them making mo mention of Jani so not useful. Also needs to be rewritten in a neutral manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ragi Jani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaldhi j! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I have seen many of articles with only one reference and even i give more than 20 references my draft always been declined I don’t know why? Talking about the Times of india which is a prestigious web news portal and newspaper of india not considering them is something which I can’t understand. I gave so many references with other newspapers and web portal and i have attached the imdb and bookmyshow profile also. Kindly consider that too. People with 2 references and no such profile exist on wikipedia. Anyways thank you for the clarification. Jaldhi j (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ragi Jani

Hello, Jaldhi j. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ragi Jani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ragi Jani

Hello, Jaldhi j. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ragi Jani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]