Jump to content

User talk:James Allison/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 20

Wikidata weekly summary #257

Wednesday night you are invited! Bay Area WikiSalon

Please join us in downtown San Francisco!
A Wikipedia panel discussion about journalism

The last Wednesday evening of every month, wiki enthusiasts gather for the Bay Area WikiSalon series to collaborate, mingle, and learn about new projects and ideas.

We allow time for informal conversation and working on articles. Newcomers and experienced wiki users are encouraged to attend. Free Wi-Fi is available so bring your editing devices. We will have beverages (including beer and wine) plus light snacks. We will have some announcements and lightning talks from the floor, and a breakout session. This is our one year anniversary, so there will be cake!


Please RSVP here, and bring a photo ID that matches your registration name. This also helps us figure out how much food and drink to bring in.


See you soon! Ben Creasy and Wayne
(Subscribe/Unsubscribe to this talk page notice here) | MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Status of University of California Student Association

James: The Wikipedia article about the University of California Student Association has a fundamental flaw. The UCSA’s primary governing document is titled “Charter…” and that title gives the false impression that UCSA was chartered by the public corporation named “The Regents of the University of California”. In fact, UCSA is an “unincorporated association” and is classified as such by the California Attorney General. UCSA has only two members: (1) Associated Students of the University of California (an independent, nonprofit, unincorporated association) and (2) The Regents of the University of California (doing business under the fictitious names “Associated Students, University of California, Davis”, “Associated Students of the University of California, Irvine”, and other UC “Associated Student” organizations).

This anomalous situation grew out of the fact that the Associated Students of the University of California (ASUC) came into existence before The Regents was established. ASUC and The Regents have executed a legally binding agreement which states that ASUC is an independent, nonprofit, unincorporated association. That agreement was entered into in accordance with Regents Policy #3301 (third paragraph); http://regents.universityofcalifornia.edu/governance/policies/3301.html

The UCSA “Charter…” falsely states that UCSA was organized under the California nonprofit public benefit corporation law. The truth is that The Regents was classified as a nonprofit public benefit corporation in the early 1980s in accordance with the transition provisions of California’s revised “Nonprofit Corporation Law”; http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=5000. It appears to me that the students have misinterpreted these facts and are proceeding on the incorrect assumption that UCSA is an “official unit” of The Regents and that UCSA is therefore a subdivision of a California nonprofit public benefit corporation. The Wikipedia article about UCSA should not be based on that incorrect assumption.

You can look up the legal status of UCSA in the records of the California Attorney General’s Registry of Charitable Trusts; http://rct.doj.ca.gov/Verification/Web/Search.aspx?facility=Y The “Details” page about UCSA reads “Type: Unincorporated Association”.

ASUC indicates that it is an “Association” on its federal Form 990; http://rct.doj.ca.gov/Verification/Web/Download.aspx?saveas=663087.PDF&document_id=09027b8f8021273b

In a letter dated January 25, 2017, the California Attorney General asked ASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA to register with the Registry of Charitable Trusts, so that association might be an “Unincorporated Association” rather than a subdivision of The Regents. And UCSA might therefore have three members instead of just two members. ASUCSB does have its own Federal Employer Identification Number; No. 951792262. http://rct.doj.ca.gov/Verification/Web/Download.aspx?saveas=170125Z09461176.pdf&document_id=09027b8f802aa073

I am going to revise the ASUC article to show ASUC's true status. MQMagoo (talk) 18:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're asking for here. Wikipedia uses reliable, third-party sources. Your wall of text seems like WP:SYNTHESIS. Feel free to open a discussion on whichever article's talk page you'd like to change, and the community can come to a consensus there. James (talk/contribs) 00:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
James: UCSA was initially a subdivision of The Regents. UCSA became independent in 2012. Some students confuse UCSA’s legal status with its tax status and then mistakenly assume that UCSA is a federally chartered corporation because it has been recognized as an organization that is exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. UCSA is not organized as a corporation under federal or state law. I added UCSA’s “Legal status” to the article’s “Infobox" in order to prevent that kind of confusion. MQMagoo (talk) 14:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Please provide reliable, third-party, independent sources for your assertions. James (talk/contribs) 17:43, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #258

If there is an error with the route diagram, then it should be corrected. Wholesale removal of information from an article could be construed as vandalism. Useddenim (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism (emphasis in original). Please AGF. James (talk/contribs) 17:33, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #259

Editing News #1—2017

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

VisualEditor
Did you know?

Did you know that you can review your changes visually?

Screenshot showing some changes to an article. Most changes are highlighted with text formatting.
When you are finished editing the page, type your edit summary and then choose "Review your changes".

In visual mode, you will see additions, removals, new links, and formatting highlighted. Other changes, such as changing the size of an image, are described in notes on the side.

Toggle button showing visual and wikitext options; visual option is selected.

Click the toggle button to switch between visual and wikitext diffs.

Screenshot showing the same changes, in the two-column wikitext diff display.

The wikitext diff is the same diff tool that is used in the wikitext editors and in the page history.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has spent most of their time supporting the 2017 wikitext editor mode which is available inside the visual editor as a Beta Feature, and adding the new visual diff tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, supporting the 2017 wikitext editor as a beta feature, and improving the visual diff tool.

Recent changes

A new wikitext editing mode is available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices. The 2017 wikitext editor has the same toolbar as the visual editor and can use the citoid service and other modern tools. Go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures to enable the ⧼Visualeditor-preference-newwikitexteditor-label⧽.

A new visual diff tool is available in VisualEditor's visual mode. You can toggle between wikitext and visual diffs. More features will be added to this later. In the future, this tool may be integrated into other MediaWiki components. [1]

The team have added multi-column support for lists of footnotes. The <references /> block can automatically display long lists of references in columns on wide screens. This makes footnotes easier to read. You can request multi-column support for your wiki. [2]

Other changes:

  • You can now use your web browser's function to switch typing direction in the new wikitext mode. This is particularly helpful for RTL language users like Urdu or Hebrew who have to write JavaScript or CSS. You can use Command+Shift+X or Control+Shift+X to trigger this. [3]
  • The way to switch between the visual editing mode and the wikitext editing mode is now consistent. There is a drop-down menu that shows the two options. This is now the same in desktop and mobile web editing, and inside things that embed editing, such as Flow. [4]
  • The Categories item has been moved to the top of the Page options menu (from clicking on the "hamburger" icon) for quicker access. [5] There is also now a "Templates used on this page" feature there. [6]
  • You can now create <chem> tags (sometimes used as <ce>) for chemical formulas inside the visual editor. [7]
  • Tables can be set as collapsed or un-collapsed. [8]
  • The Special character menu now includes characters for Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics and angle quotation marks (‹› and ⟨⟩) . The team thanks the volunteer developer, Tpt. [9]
  • A bug caused some section edit conflicts to blank the rest of the page. This has been fixed. The team are sorry for the disruption. [10]
  • There is a new keyboard shortcut for citations: Control+Shift+K on a PC, or Command+Shift+K on a Mac. It is based on the keyboard shortcut for making links, which is Control+K on a PC or Command+K on a Mac. [11]

Future changes

  • The VisualEditor team is working with the Community Tech team on a syntax highlighting tool. It will highlight matching pairs of <ref> tags and other types of wikitext syntax. You will be able to turn it on and off. It will first become available in VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode, maybe late in 2017. [12]
  • The kind of button used to Show preview, Show changes, and finish an edit will change in all WMF-supported wikitext editors. The new buttons will use OOjs UI. The buttons will be larger, brighter, and easier to read. The labels will remain the same. You can test the new button by editing a page and adding &ooui=1 to the end of the URL, like this: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Project:Sandbox?action=edit&ooui=1 The old appearance will no longer be possible, even with local CSS changes. [13]
  • The outdated 2006 wikitext editor will be removed later this year. It is used by approximately 0.03% of active editors. See a list of editing tools on mediawiki.org if you are uncertain which one you use. [14]

If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Expo/Crenshaw station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transfer station. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #260

Categories & Subcategories

James, Re: this change you reverted, Articles sould be placed in their most specific category. Transport infrastructure completed in 2015 is a subcat of Buildings and structures completed in 2015, therefore the latter can be removed. TiMike (talk) 23:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #261

Everybody is invited to the May 31 Bay Area WikiSalon series!

Please join us in downtown San Francisco!
A Wikipedia panel discussion about journalism

The last Wednesday evening of every month, wiki enthusiasts gather at Bay Area WikiSalon to collaborate, mingle, and learn about new projects and ideas. This month we are taking it on the road to Noisebridge makerspace/hackerspace!

We allow time for informal conversation and working on articles. Newcomers and experienced wiki users are encouraged to attend. Free Wi-Fi is available so bring your editing devices. We will have beverages (including beer and wine) plus light snacks. There will be periodic guided tours of Noisebridge. You can stay late, on your own! YeeHaw!


For details and to RSVP, see: Wikipedia:Bay Area WikiSalon, May 2017


See you soon! Ben Creasy and Wayne
(Subscribe/Unsubscribe to this talk page notice here) | MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:07, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Come and join us at the Wiknic

LA Meetup: 6th Wiknic, 7/15 @ Pan Pacific Park

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

You are cordially invited to the 6th Los Angeles Wiknic, a part of the nationwide Great American Wiknic. We'll be grilling, getting to know each other better, and building the L.A. Wikipedia community! The event is planned for Pan-Pacific Park and will be held on Saturday, July 15, 2017 from 9:30am to 4pm or so. Please RSVP and volunteer to bring food or drinks if possible!

I hope to see you there! Howcheng (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Join our Facebook group here! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Wikidata weekly summary #262

Charles W. Davidson College of Engineering

How is Charles W. Davidson College of Engineering not okay when many other similar articles, such as the George R. Brown School of Engineering barely has any resources for the same kind of content? I will do anything to keep the article on Wikipedia because I spent the whole day working on it (of which most of it was removed because of rules I wasn't even aware of). I have been questioning your edits primarily because SJSU having to be exclusive from other universities, despite many universities having similar content (such as the template). If you could please at least justify your argument as to why the article should be deleted, that would be nice. None of your previous standpoints make any sense; surely some primary resources are better than near to nothing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SJSU Moi (talkcontribs) 19:57, 2017 May 31 (UTC)

Hi. First, please put new posts at the bottom of talk pages. Second, please sign your posts. Third, not knowing policies and guidelines on Wikipedia is not an excuse. If you are not familiar with wiki practices, I suggest reviewing WP:HOW generally; and WP:BOOSTER, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:IRS, and WP:HARDWORK specifically, before editing further. Thank you. James (talk/contribs) 10:29, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #263

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

Wikidata weekly summary #264

Do you see any sources on the other names? They don't need references because the linked articles would have the needed info written in their main content! In this case, "Anderson and Land met at their fraternity in University of California, Irvine.[2][5][6]" is written in the SLANDER article. - TheMagnificentist 16:09, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Are you going to say anything? You reverted my edit so I came here to discuss that but you're not replying. I'm no newbie. I feel that the reversion was disrespectful and should have been discussed beforehand. - TheMagnificentist 07:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
BRD isn't disrespectful. If there's a source, put it in the article. Your point is taken, but OSE doesn't get to override the verifiability pillar. The other names, too, should be sourced in the article itself. James (talk/contribs) 15:18, 13 June 2017 (UTC)