User talk:James Zeeder

Welcome!

Hello, James Zeeder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! McSly (talk) 03:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello, I'm Whispering. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Chiropractic seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whispering^(t) 04:21, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Response from James Zeeder (talk) 04:50, 3 October 2019 (UTC): I agree with the first statement, but not with the second. If you think these comments are less than neutral please refer to pseudoscientific - statement is correct; similar, with additional information provided in subsection Australia within Chiropractic. Feel free to check back if needed. Thank you. James Zeeder (talk) 04:50, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Edit war

Regarding the edits at Chiropractic, please bear in mind that edit warring will result in blocks. If you add material that someone reverts, the correct procedure is to use the article talk page (Talk:Chiropractic) to explain why your edit is desirable. Content is not decided by whoever is more willing to revert. Johnuniq (talk) 09:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Removed unsigned comment James Zeeder (talk) 06:59, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I have added to talk page - great idea. James Zeeder (talk) 07:20, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Perhaps best read over Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle.--Moxy 🍁 07:29, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes it is a good non-mandated Wikipedia policy that we have, but better success with alternatives to this approach is sometimes achievable. If you need any further help feel free to ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. James Zeeder (talk) 08:50, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 20:48, 6 October 2019 (UTC)