Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:
Some of these citations aren't relevant. "The band is known for their energetic live performances" linking to a video of a performance doesn't show they are "known" forthat.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gorkhali Takma band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Janakjk21!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- NotCharizard🗨 11:28, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
YouTube, Spotify and Facebook are not reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gorkhali Takma band and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
@Theroadislong I get it YouTube and Spotify are not reliable, but they are mentioned there for band songs and performances and not as sources. I have mentioned plenty of news articles, magazine mentions, and other blogs and articles as the source for the article. if it may help and the band, i think, is known name in the country of Nepal, it will be appreciated if you view it in context of Nepal rather than numbers Your reply and insights on the topic will be appreciated. Janakjk21 (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The "Musical Style" has one source...Facebook and the tone is not appropriate, the draft sets out to praise the band whereas it should dispassionately report only what the reliable independent sources say and show how they pass WP:NBAND, which isn't at all clear. Theroadislong (talk) 15:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@TheroadislongShould I change the content just to report on what the band is about with the same source? will that work help me out here? This is my first article and it's confusing Janakjk21 (talk) 15:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia isn't interested in what Facebook says about them, we need independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Theroadislong Sorry for that but there is just one Facebook reference i mentioned because the news article company that published that article is no more so i found the same article they published on Facebook, so i had it as a reference If that is only the reason, then i will be happy to remove it and resubmit it . (thanks for the feed back ) Janakjk21 (talk) 15:51, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
