User talk:Janeesah

I would like to disclose that I do work for the crowdfunding platform, Fundable. We were not listed on some crowdfunding pages correctly nor did we have a Fundable page, so I have edited to include facts (with references). Janeesah (talk) 19:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC) Janeesah[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:WilSchroterheadshot.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:WilSchroterheadshot.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, Janeesah. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Fundable, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. You also have a conflict of interest in the article Wil schroter. ww2censor (talk) 17:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ww2censor. I posted the information on Crunchbase - it is my material. I have also disclosed that I work for Fundable on my user page and used a plethora of unaffiliated citations to make sure my material does not breach Wikipedia's rules. While Wikipedia does advise not to post biased material, I have maintained a factual-based approach to the articles supported by outside sources, news outlets, etc. I also updated the copyright information on Wil's picture to state that it is his and was taken from his profile on Cbusr.com, but it appears that the picture was deleted even after that information. Janeesah (talk) 18:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC) Janeesah[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Fundable, Janeesah!

Wikipedia editor Jrcrin001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Rated as a stub. Some minor cleanup will help the rating.

To reply, leave a comment on Jrcrin001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Wil Schroter

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wil Schroter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ahmetlii (talk) 17:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wil Schroter

The article Wil Schroter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Recreation of deleted material in 2008, also seems not notable, don't have any RS citations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahmetlii (talk) 14:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fundable for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fundable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fundable (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ahmetlii (talk) 14:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wil Schroter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wil Schroter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wil Schroter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ahmetlii (talk) 15:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]