User talk:Jeffmister

Welcome!

Hello, Jeffmister, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair\^talk 09:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources

Please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages, as you did to TVSN, unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. --Geniac 14:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Austar

Hi just a quick question....are you planing on fixing up the new Austar channel page that you started to show the correct package's that Austar use and also remove the channels that Austar doesn't have like 100 etc, if not can you let me know so that i can get into it a fix it up so that it not the foxtel lineup. thanks Thuringowacityrep 10:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'll make a start today and see how i go. Thanks for your reply Thuringowacityrep 22:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Foxtel Channels

Hi there. There's no point just telling me a source - if you're adding information to an article, please reference it within the article or the content will again be removed.

Also, I've reverted your addition of NITV to the list - it hasn't actually been added to the line-up, or started screening previews, so it does not belong in the list of active channels.

Chrisch^Talk 12:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fox Sports Australia.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fox Sports Australia.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie

If you use TWINKLE, start issuing warnings to these IPS, else, install it from WP:TW --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:28, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 13:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]