User talk:jhanCRUSH

Welcome!

Hello, JhanCRUSH, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Happy new Headcheese!-hexa Chord ² 01:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Houston Alexander/James Irvin

Your changes to the narrative on James Irvin and Houston Alexander were very well done. However, there is still a problem with changing the outcome of the fight to "TKO (strikes)", because that's not the "official" outcome of the fight. Sherdog reports the outcome the athletic commission does, and according to them the outcome was "KO (superman punch)." While I agree that, having watched the fight, the superman punch is not what knocked Alexander out, the official result is still "KO (superman punch)." The tables need to reflect that because that's what the official source says. Gromlakh (talk) 22:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find anything on Sherdog claiming that their reports mirrored the official athletic commission reports, and I couldn't find the Colorado Athletic Commission report for UFC Fight Night 13, so I did a little more research and found that on the Sherdog Fight Finder report for UFC 94 they said that Machida won by KO and GSP won by corner stoppage, but the Nevada Athletic Commission report says Machida won by TKO and GSP won by doctor stoppage. The only places online that I could find that claimed "official results" for the Irvin/Alexander fight were fanhouse which says "TKO due to strikes" and MMAJunkie which says "TKO (punches)." I really searched for a source that claimed to be official that said KO due to superman punch, but I couldn't find one anywhere. If you can find one for me, I would be glad to change it. --jhanCRUSH 00:11, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Odd, they're usually pretty good about using the officially reported results. I'd suggest maybe directly sourcing the fight outcome to the article used earlier to clarify, because otherwise we generally go with the result listed in Sherdog. Gromlakh (talk) 00:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Rollback

Hiya. I've added the rollback flag. Please remember to use it only for vandlaism. You can learn more at WP:RBK or feel free to ask me. Pedro : Chat 21:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Konjac

Do you call the Africa people and African American, "Nigger" or "Negro"? Mr.JhanCRUSH 114.164.204.239 (talk) 07:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

response and explanation at User talk:114.164.204.239. --jhanCRUSH 07:26, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The thing that you are doing is only a promotion of the racial discrimination. 114.164.204.239 (talk) 07:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You must be not related if you do not know anything. It is an alias named from the viewpoint of the racial discrimination in the age when Japanese food was not understood. Today, Is African-American called "Negro"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.164.204.239 (talk) 07:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have now taken the time to view various webpages [1] [2] [3] that list "devil's tongue" and "snake palm" as alternate English names for the plant "Amorphophallus konjac." Although these names may be offensive when translated into Japanese and applied to a Japanese person, their interpretation and meaning carries no offense in the English language. These names must remain on the konjac article so that English-speaking users of Wikipedia might be able to locate information on the plant that is commonly known as "snake palm" or "devil's tongue" without suffering undue confusion. Removal of such factually correct and properly sourced material is against Wikipedia's policies and edits that do such will be reverted. Thank you for your interest in improving Wikipedia. --jhanCRUSH 08:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have given him a {{subst:uw-3rr|Konjac}} warning... if he continues he should be reported here rdunn PLIB 15:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He persisted after being warned and has been blocked. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 18:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection

Since your userpage was being vandalized by a ton of vandals today, I've semi-protected it for 2 weeks as a measure of security. If you'd like me to lift it, please contact me. bibliomaniac 1 5 05:16, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		"Congrats" on your userpage getting vandalized, it means you're doing something right :) --aktsu ^(t / c) 16:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GSP

Can you please explain why my GSP edit has been reverted? Clearly, the date is wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.65.146.1 (talk) 03:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that... I just got back from a couple months in the future and I got confused about the current date. It could have happened to anyone. I have undone my own edit. Sorry. --jhanCRUSH 03:04, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lee klein

what do you propose? what needs to be wikified? why don't you go ahead and clean it up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.16.227 (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2009 further citation added book in the yale library —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.16.227 (talk) 23:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My reponse is at User talk:72.229.16.227. --jhanCRUSH 00:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jhan, thank for all your help! With the citations fixed and the ones not substatiated removed can the lower banner come down?

Thanks!

Thanks for the support on my talk page. Greatly appreciate it! Gnowor^Talk2Me_{did wha?} 03:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage (my very first!). It probably would have taken me forever to notice it. – PranksterTurtle ^(talk) 04:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. As I was recently told ^^above^^... if your userpage gets vandalized, you must be doing something right. Keep up the good work. --jhanCRUSH 04:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Thanks!

No problem! Always happy to help :) - Fastily (talk) 06:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Guy Mezger

Please refrain from making making changes to the article concerning Guy Mezger. The original article was NOT neutral, but most likely written from a fan's view. Please read Wikipedia's rules and guide lines concerning this. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.190.70.143 (talk • contribs)

AfD nomination of Mike Dolce

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mike Dolce. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Dolce. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:JhanCRUSH/Heath Herring

User:JhanCRUSH/Heath Herring, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JhanCRUSH/Heath Herring and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:JhanCRUSH/Heath Herring during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 01:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MMA Event Notability

You are invited to join the discussion at WT:MMA#MMA_Event_Notability. Kevlar (talk) 18:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JhanCRUSH/John Grubb Atkinson

A tag has been placed on User:JhanCRUSH/John Grubb Atkinson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:JhanCRUSH/Greg Jackson

User:JhanCRUSH/Greg Jackson, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JhanCRUSH/Greg Jackson and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:JhanCRUSH/Greg Jackson during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!