User talk:Jms40nyu

May 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kate Crawford have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kate Crawford was changed by Jms40nyu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939605 on 2024-05-11T21:54:52+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:RealElliottCrawford per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RealElliottCrawford. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- I'm not a sockpuppet. RealElliottCrawford is my kid, so I assume this is some odd issue with us using the same IP address? Jms40nyu (talk) 21:33, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jms40nyu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi -- I'm not a sockpuppet. RealElliottCrawford is my kid, so I assume this is some odd issue with us using the same IP address?

Decline reason:

In such cases, we treat both accounts as though they were controlled by a single person. Yamla (talk) 21:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.