User talk:JohnPaulSmith

Welcome!

Hello, JohnPaulSmith, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:JohnPaulSmith/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WNYY98 (talk) 04:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JohnPaulSmith/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:JohnPaulSmith/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WNYY98 (talk) 04:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Enterprise architecture planning

Thanks for your work adding Enterprise architecture planning lemma. I did removed the following text:

Historical analysis of EA publications shows that BSP, EAP and all subsequent EA frameworks are "nothing more than typical management fads aggressively promoted by consulting companies and gurus.

Reference: "Enterprise Architecture Frameworks: The Fad of the Century", Svyatoslav Kotusev, British Computer Society (BCS), July 2016

Personally I find this a very interesting point of view, but Wikipedia is no platform to promote the latest news unless it confirmed (in secondary sources) to be a notable opinion. -- Mdd (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is unacceptable, that without giving any response here, you restored the section here at the Enterprise architecture planning with the editsummary Criticism section improved. This is clearly not the case if you take the previous given arguments serious. -- Mdd (talk) 23:44, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The CSVLOD model of enterprise architecture

The article The CSVLOD model of enterprise architecture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Brainchild of one guy, didn't turn up independent coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:42, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The CSVLOD model of enterprise architecture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The CSVLOD model of enterprise architecture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The CSVLOD model of enterprise architecture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:44, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]