User talk:JohnnyCesh

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victoria Nikolaevskaja (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Shadow311 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Victoria Nikolaevskaja and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Shadow311 (talk) 16:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnnyCesh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Shadow311 (talk) 16:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok then make the article good so that it dont get deleted. you bot. JohnnyCesh (talk) 18:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barring better sources, there's no way this leaves draft. We can't use IMDb (no editorial oversight), and I'm not really seeing anything meaningful in an Internet search (string: "victoria nikolaevskaja"). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 20:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a jerk to everyone you've encountered so far. Sorry, this is not going to work out..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Victoria Nikolaevskaja

Hello, JohnnyCesh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Victoria Nikolaevskaja, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]