User talk:Johnny Squeaky

Editing against consensus

This is contrary to established consensus. Please discuss this issue and establish a consensus to support the change before doing this again. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Johnny_Squeaky_and_.22Trivia.22 regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 06:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion page edits

When posting to discussion pages do not interpose comments in the middle of other editor's posts as you did here. Also, do not re-order the discussion as you did here. These are disruptive practices as they make the thread difficult to follow. Tiderolls 07:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thanks for the pointer! =//= Johnny Squeaky 01:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I: Community restrictions

Hello,

I closed the AN/I discussion with regards to your edits on "In popular culture" / "Trivia" sections. As a result, community consensus has restricted you to a one-revert rule throughout the project, and you are prohibited from changing the title of section headings to "Trivia", broadly construed. You may appeal these restrictions in the future by requesting it at WP:AN/I. L Faraone 04:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your "name"?

Hey there, I was scanning very quickly down the edit history of an article when your "name" jumped out at me. I stopped and stared for a couple of seconds. Then it hit me, and I laughed. So I just can't resist inquiring, is your choice of name purely coincidental, or are you an opera fan? :)

March 2014

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tanning addiction, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnny Squeaky, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Betty Logan (talk) 03:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnny Squeaky. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]