User talk:Johnny at ECCO

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am looking to create and publish content on the ECCO Safety Group wiki page, but I want to disclose my role as Marketing Analyst at the company. I know Wikipedia has guidelines to ensure objectivity, which I have reviewed, but I am unsure how to proceed. The company shows up on the disambiguation page for "ECCO", but no actual link/page exists from there.

Let me know the next steps I need to follow to get the process started. Thanks so much!

Johnny at ECCO (talk) 18:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johnny at ECCO and thank you for asking! You can disclose your editing status/conflict of interest by following the directions here. As far as the article creation goes, I'd recommend reviewing "your first article" and then drafting it through our articles for creation process by using the article wizard if you feel that it meets the criteria. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny at ECCO, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Johnny at ECCO! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ECCO Safety Group (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Overly suggestive of an advertised business profile with the information and sources being similar to company announcements or notices, and therefore cannot be accepted; notability cannot be inherited and this applies to companies too. Source 10, for example, is only a local announcement about its activities.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ECCO Safety Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 00:28, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ECCO Safety Group (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Otterathome was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ECCO Safety Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Otterathome (talk) 00:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ECCO Safety Group concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:ECCO Safety Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ECCO Safety Group

Hello, Johnny at ECCO. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ECCO Safety Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]