User talk:Johnson.keoni
| This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Concordia_University_Chicago/Non-Western_Art_ART2200_(Spring_2020) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Johnson.keoni, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]
Great job on a putting a good amount of info and including pieces of art work such as the Catching a Catfish piece. I really like how you explained the art and also included what you thought of it.
Helenandrews86 (talk) 02:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
[edit]
|
Your paragraph is very well written. I think you could talk more about the Catching A Catfish with a Gourd. Overall you have a nice amount of source to back up your evidence. Madisondaoust (talk) 03:41, 5 March 2020 (UTC) |
A brownie for you!
[edit]
|
You did a great job of explaining the 14th century art. I like how in depth you went as well as how you included an explanation of an actual painting. I would maybe add another painting or two that was pretty well known during the time in order to include some more references in your article. Laurenk17 (talk) 02:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
Hey, GREAT POST VERY CREDIBLE!
Jaharialayeart (talk) 21:09, 16 March 2020 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Very good work, it definitely looks like a Wikipedia article. Your information is very detailed, it is grammatically correct, and I like how you include examples of paintings. Just make sure to add your references to give credit to the sources you used. Mariamelia Zaragoza (talk) 23:48, 22 March 2020 (UTC) |
Some stroopwafels for you!
[edit]
|
I think that this is really good overall. Make sure that your sources are getting added to the bibliography. Good job! Adellert (talk) 02:19, 23 March 2020 (UTC) |
Some stroopwafels for you!
[edit]|
|
One thing I will suggest is adding the sources you used. Other than that the information is good. Orodriguezr (talk) 17:45, 23 March 2020 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| good job, I consider you did exposed good amount of information without saturating the reader. Mateoporras16 (talk) 20:21, 23 March 2020 (UTC) |
A pie for you!
[edit]
|
Hi, good detail on the artwork. Great job on including sources into the writing. Crf figuerjm (talk) 01:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Japanese Painting
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Japanese Painting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Praxidicae: - this wasn't copied from the source - the listed website copied from Wikipedia. However that said, Johnson.keoni - this is a copy from a Wikipedia article and only has minor changes. Since this wasn't attributed in the article history this does pose a copyright issue. This is also a copy of this section, which poses an issue since there's no reason for this specific section to have its own article at this point in time. This will almost certainly be deleted for these issues. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC)