User talk:Jon2harman

Hello, Jon2harman! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Redrose64 (talk) 14:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Infobox GB station: image size[edit]

Hi, I see that you are carrying out edits like this - there should be no need to do that, because use of the |image_name= parameter will use the default size for {{Infobox GB station}} images, which is 265px; this gives a consistent appearance for the (several thousand) pages using that infobox. If it is necessary to size the image, for example a very tall image may need to be narrowed to make it a reasonable height, the |imagesize= parameter is available for this purpose, ie |image_name=Bootle Oriel Road.jpg |imagesize=250px --14:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing this out. I was attempting to introduce some uniformity to some Merseyrail station articles, unaware that Template:Infobox GB station had a default image size. I couldn't see it listed on the infobox page - do you know if it's listed anywhere? Indeed, could you tell me how I can find out the styling for the infobox and any other defaults? Shall I reverse the said changes I made? Thanks for for your help, Jon2harman (talk) 14:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See the template's documentation; under Optional fields it shows:

| image       = [[Image:Crewe station platform12.jpg|265px]]

or

| image_name  = Crewe station platform12.jpg
| imagesize   = 265px

Note: only one of the image fields should be used. 'image' allows an image width to be specified, while 'image_name' automatically sets the width to 265px unless 'imagesize' is specified (preferred).

When you use |image_name=, you must be careful that if a |imagesize= parameter is provided, it mustn't be left blank - that can cause an absolutely enormous image to be shown. Try putting the following line into a sandbox page:

{{infobox GB station |name=Crewe |image_name=Crewe station platform12.jpg |imagesize=}}

Then try the same but omitting the |imagesize=.

The |image= parameter also has a pitfall, but less dramatic - some people try to use it to display a caption, as in [[File:Crewe station platform12.jpg|265px|Platform 12 at Crewe station]] - that simply won't work, captions must be placed in the |caption= parameter whether |image= or |image_name= is used.

Some templates are a bit short on details in their documentation. I often double-check by clicking the "Edit" or "View source" tab at the top, to see how the template actually works.

As regards reversing your changes: if the previous version didn't explicitly use |imagesize= to state a size, and the image is in landscape format, it's probably a good idea. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:48, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Redrose. I hadn't seen "'image_name' automatically sets the width to 265px" on the Template:Infobox GB station page. I was just curious to know if there was a way of looking at the source code of the template to see how it parses the markup, but I'll leave that to another day! I've reversed my changes. Jon2harman (talk) 22:14, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Hooton railway station. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Raywil (talk) 23:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make sure to do this in future. Sorry, I was getting lazy.... Oh, does this include my talk page too?

Image galleries[edit]

Hi, re this and similar edits: I don't think that a gallery of just one (or two) images is necessarily a "good thing" - placing images here and there through the article is permitted by the manual of style. In several articles there are right-aligned images directly below the infobox, and this can cause problems with certain browsers (such as Internet Explorer) where excessive amounts of blank space then occur to the left of the infobox. In such cases I find that it's easiest to align the image left, and move it down into a suitable section - for an old photo like this, just below the "History" heading would be a good place. This keeps the image at a visible size (gallery images are tiny), and also keeps it in context. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the advice. I'm glad you're keeping an eye on what I'm doing! I'll read the manual of style and other Wikipedia documentation before I make big edits (for me, anyway) like this in future. I know, starting with the links at the top of this page would be a good idea! Do you think I should edit these pages to reflect your advice?

I'm not watching everything you're doing: just those pages which happen to be on my watchlist. I've moved the image up the page again, but this time put it in the history section, see here. It's probably best to take it on a case by case basis, as sometimes there is so little text that the use of more than one or two images will dominate the article. See also WP:IG for more on image galleries. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:05, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! -Mike Restivo (talk) 20:15, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mike!

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]