User talk:JonFlaune

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Nomination of Gates of Vienna for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gates of Vienna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gates of Vienna (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. E4024 (talk) 18:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

deliberate removal of material on user talk page[edit]

it is disruptive - see WP:disruptive_editing - can you please revert so that your entire talk page is visible (archived is ok, too). Soosim (talk) 07:35, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

WP:ANI[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. You can comment the discussion here on your talk page, if you will. --Pudeo' 00:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rachel Corrie Foundation for Peace and Justice[edit]

Hello JonFlaune,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rachel Corrie Foundation for Peace and Justice for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Alanl (talk) 17:47, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Defeating Eurabia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Defeating Eurabia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defeating Eurabia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jason from nyc (talk) 20:45, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Rachel Corrie & Neutrality discussion board[edit]

Hi Jon. Just letting you know that I have initiated a discussion mentioning you at the Neutrality discussion board [1]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)