User talk:Journalstudent

Nomination of The Edward Snowden Affair: Exposing the Politics and Media Behind the NSA Scandal for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Edward Snowden Affair: Exposing the Politics and Media Behind the NSA Scandal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Edward Snowden Affair: Exposing the Politics and Media Behind the NSA Scandal (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Gaff ^ταλκ 22:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The content of this page is different than the other, see subject headings. The other was deleted because it didn't clarify the "noteworthiness" of the book, i.e., media citations. This one documents that it was the topic of an ABC Network discussion, amongst other media in New Orleans, Phoenix, Boston, etc.

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Journalstudent. You have new messages at StephenBuxton's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I am getting an error message saying I'm on a block proxy. Not sure what that means but it says to wait for administrator.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Journalstudent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Journalstudent (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Maldoror2". The reason given for Maldoror2's block is: "Disrupting Wikipedia to make a point".

Blocking administrator: Yunshui (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You say you don't know who maldoror2 is; yet you've been editing on the same IP, with the same computer, on the same articles as that user. Looks like autoblock is working as designed. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AnswerMy professor said that this is probably because we're in a dorm (he said shared ip or whatever) and whoever too the username is my or another of this classes and has said to ask you to clear me.

I don't know who maldoror2 is. Is this an admin? Why have I been locked out? Plz help.

Thanks wiki[edit]

My professor assigned us to contribute to the book he's assigned us and all of a sudden I get a block proxy warning saying admin malador2 has locked me out. I don't know why. I'm probably going to fail this assignment now. Thanks wiki.

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Maldoror2 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not even worth filing an SPI for this. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Journalstudent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My professor said that this is probably because we're in a dorm and whoever took the username is in my or another of his classes and has said to ask you to clear me. Journalstudent (talk) 18:27, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 07:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I told you why. My professor said that one of my classmates has probably caused this and now the entire computer lab can't get on. The entire class has to show that we all improved one article on Wikipedia before Friday at 10 a.m. Please help! I'll stay awake until you write back.

Oh my professor said he was going to speak to you guys about this. I'm guessing he hasn't yet.

Talk page access revoked[edit]

I've revoked talk page access as we don't seem to be getting anywhere. To be perfectly honest, I'm skeptical of your version of events which includes a professor that you don't name, who has set a course assignment involving Wikipedia. Anyway, I suggest your professor emails whoever his contact is within Wikipedia, and from there a decision to unblock could be made. PhilKnight (talk) 15:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]