User talk:Joye77

Hello, Joye77, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 01:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 16:52, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joye77. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Hello! GeneralNotability I had created a page and since then I have been blocking for no means. I don't know why people think Wikipedia editors edit the Wikipedia only when someone pays them. Can someone imagine there are thousands of Wikipedians who create pages and edit pages having their interest? I created the page based on my interest and of course, when that gets deleted I would care because I spent a lot of time creating that. Having an interest in something and creating a page is against Wikipedia then I am going to quit Wikipedia, if it is not, then please have a look at the matter and unblock me. I requested at the platform when my account was blocked. They didn't unblock me and I created another account. Another account is mine, there is no doubt, but that was created due to the block of my account.Joye77 (talk) 17:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfair block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joye77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Joye77 (talk) 17:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have been requesting for unblocking and no one is looking into the matter. The crime I did is, I created a page, if that is against the Wikipedia policies, no one should be allowed to create a page. If it is not, my unfair block should be reverted. Please have a look at the matter. Joye77 (talk) 17:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. And your logic here is mistaken. It may be appropriate for you to create some pages but inappropriate for you to create other pages. --Yamla (talk) 18:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joye77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had previously requested for unblocking but I wasn't unblocked, I think the way I requested was not adequate. I am going to answer the questions by the administrator who rejected my request. I hope, this time, my request will be entertained.

The block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. I pledge that I'll not do any editing which is against the Wikipedia policies.
The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for. I had been blocked for creating another account, this was not intentional, I was not aware that creating another account is against the policy. I had requested for unblocking but when they refused to unblock me, I created another account. This was not to bypass the block, it was my mistake and I apologize for that. Also, I had been asked if I had been paid by anyone, I'm again saying that I have not been paid or I am not expecting any kind of payment. What I am doing is purely based on my interest.
I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I'll do only useful edit on Wikipedia.
I pledge I'll make useful contributions only.Joye77 (talk) 09:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't state what edits you wish to make. Furthermore, you say "I had requested for unblocking but when they refused to unblock me, I created another account. This was not to bypass the block" but you created another account after you were not unblocked in order to..... bypass the block. Since you don't seem to understand what is going on here, you seem to lack the skills needed to participate here, and I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 23:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joye77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Joye77 (talk) 12:15 pm, Yesterday (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

You still haven't addressed the original reason for the block, namely promotional editing. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello 331dot (talk)! I am going to edit anything which I have interest in and of course, I'll edit the page I created as well. Secondly, I created another account because at the time I was not aware that creating another account is against the policy. I understand all things now that is why I am requesting unblock here. If I didn't understand the matter I wouldn't have requested here. Joye77 (talk) 17:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joye77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello! When I say I'll edit the Wikipedia in accordance with the Wikipedia guidelines, of course, I'll not do promotional editing. Also, if there is anything I have to pledge separately, I ensure I'll follow the Wikipedia rules. But it is not possible to write everything in the request and not fair to ask a new question every time I request for unblocking. Hope this time I'll be unblocked. Joye77 (talk) 17:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 08:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've moved your statement so it is within your request, as it should be. No one is asking new questions with every request you make; you have yet to provide adequate answers to the existing questions. 331dot (talk) 14:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:3D Organon

Hello, Joye77. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "3D Organon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]