User talk:Jplarkin

Banned means "banned", TAWT

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 21:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jplarkin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

TAWT was a long time ago. At that time, I tried to say I was sorry and asked how I could make amends with the people I had offended, but I couldn't get a straight answer from anyone. I have been editing constructively from this account for seven months, and have set up articles which remain today because of their notability. Hopefully we can all be adult about this and acknowledge that I was being very childish back then, but am now a credit to the project and I deserve a second chance, based on the fact that, for the past seven months, I have worked only to better the encyclopedia.

Decline reason:

Then for seven months you have continued to ignore Wikipedia policy. This (as you admit) is a sock account and will therefore not be unblocked. I suggest you go back to your home account and ask for an unblock there, also you should disclose ALL the alternative accounts that you have ever used. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edit-conflicted decline: Not a long time ago. User:The abominable Wiki troll edited as late as February 2010. You must make any unban requests with the account under which you were banned. See WP:BASC. Sandstein 22:46, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is quite a while. No vandalism for months, showing that I have changed my ways. How on earth can I make an unblock request from the abominable wiki troll when the talk page is banned? I'm pretty baffled as to why Wikipedia mods would be so keen to block someone who only wants to help the project. Jplarkin (talk) 22:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jplarkin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a constructive editor and wish to be unblocked. I have vandalised in the past yes, but that was over seven months ago. I cannot remember my first account.

Decline reason:

You will need to email ArbCom directly as detailed here. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jplarkin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why i'm begging you to keep my account active, who cares. I'm currently using many established accounts to edit constructively, as well as vandalise and edit war. Block this account if you want, it will simply join the list of many fallen soldiers, such as 2009's User:PhilOak and the early 2009 work of User:RabAllan, how could we forget the great investigation almost two years ago Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/RabAllan. The strain we exerted on User:JD554 was so much he had to retire with ill health. And we must not forget where all this fun began, back in March 2008 with a certain User talk:Susan lee54. You thought you had extinguished all traces of my work, but i simply took a vacation for a fortnight and went back to work in April. You've now caught up with me and i'm looking forward to having a great working relationship over the festive season. It's the festive season which seems to generate the most carnage. The death of my beloved PhilOak was on the stroke of New Years Day. I bet you had a wank over your barnstars on your user page when you ended its run. It didn't bother me in the slightest, i came home from a great party, where intercourse was acheived and i created yet more accounts to vandalise with aplomb. Just shows what sort of patheric low life you are as all you do on hogmany is blocked wiki accounts. Clearly you are all would be sexual predators who have absolutely zero chance of ever getting sex with a female, not even a hooker would sleep with you. Merry Christmas and so long JD554.

Decline reason:

You will need to email ArbCom directly as detailed here & on to editing block to protect this page too Skier Dude (talk 05:11, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment After exhilarating sex and/or a great party I am in no condition to log onto the internet - still "Diff'rent strokes..." (as it were) "for diff'rent folks!" I guess. LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Woodcockmugshot1.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Woodcockmugshot1.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Woodcockmugshot1.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Woodcockmugshot1.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Hartamateur.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hartamateur.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]