User talk:Jr2468

February 2023: Stop making the same edit once when you've been reverted for it

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Diamonds & Dancefloors, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 01:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Taylor Swift singles discography, you may be blocked from editing. Ippantekina (talk) 02:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Jxdn. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 20:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Selena Gomez's debut solo album

I have undone your edits changing Revival to Gomez's debut solo album and Stars Dance to a mixtape. A change of this magnitude would require that you start a discussion at either Talk:Revival (Selena Gomez album) or Talk:Selena Gomez discography and it be strongly backed up by reliable sources.--N Ø 22:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tate McRae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LP. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please get consensus for significant changes

Hello. As another editor told you above, you need to get consensus for significant changes. Your edits to Romance (Camila Cabello album) downgrading "Cry for Me" and "Easy" to "promotional singles" has been disputed on the talk page with no consensus to remove them as singles for years. See Talk:Romance (Camila Cabello album)#Cry for Me, Easy and Living Proof - SINGLES???? and Talk:Romance (Camila Cabello album)#Revisiting "My Oh My" as a single. You absolutely will need consensus per WP:BRD to do this. Do not silently make edits of this magnitude without at least checking the talk page to see if the topic has been raised before. Fine, you made a bold edit, but it's been reverted, now it needs to be discussed. Any further reverts (when there are sources calling "My Oh My" the sixth single) will be referred to an administrator. Thank you. Ss112 12:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Vogue (Madonna song), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Camila Cabello discography. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 15:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above: get consensus for contentious changes

As I said above, #Please get consensus for significant changes, you should propose contentious changes before making them, or at the very least, now that you have been reverted at JoJo Siwa, you will need consensus on the talk page to reclassify her singles from her career as "promotional singles". Singles do not need to be added to US radio to be singles. Songs can absolutely be digital singles, and regardless, the sources on "Boomerang" call it a single and not a "promotional" one. Besides, where is the impact date for "Karma"? It hasn't even been released—do you know or have a source if it will be added to US pop radio? If you revert these changes, you will be reported to an administrator—your actions are very indicative of several IP editors whose sole or main purpose here is to dispute which pop singers' singles are promotional and which aren't. This is very block-evasion type behaviour, so I suggest you start a discussion on Talk:JoJo Siwa and follow WP:BRD if you want to call her previous songs "promotional singles". You can't make "Karma" her debut single because you want it to be. Ss112 04:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note This block is for multiple reasons, starting with your long history of unconstructive editing. You have a wall of warnings to which you have not responded and your recently created sockpuppet where you were continuing this pattern of behavior. If this resumes, your next block will be indefinite. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]