User talk:JuanRiley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Thank you for your interest in references :). You can find an example of a number of different techniques at the article Ketamine where I have just reworked them. When using shortened footnotes inside ref tags I use {{harvnb|...|...}} because {{sfn|...|...}} won't work. Blah... If you have questions or want help on refs anytime, post to my talk page. Yours in detail oriented reference formatting. - - MrBill3 (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

British Empire[edit]

Please stop reverting edits that you have no reason do revert. I already mentioned my reason why I deleted that passage. Germany was the main cause for Britain's economic deterioration due to the nation's rapid industrialization and it's overseas expansion, leading to tensions between both nations eventually leading to WWII. Although the United States became a superpower after Britain, this comes in a later episode after WWII and the Cold War, but that's another story. You didn't explain your reverts so I hope I'm mistaken that your edit was nationalistically motivated. (N0n3up (talk) 18:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC))

User:N0n3up This discussion belongs on that talk page not here. Juan Riley (talk) 18:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Then be my guest
You haven't provided a source. I'm beginning to think your edits are a US nationalistic reason, I provided source, why don't you? (N0n3up (talk) 19:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC))

Either way, you seem too irritated for taking out that sentence. Either it might be the Irish temper of yours that might compel you to act in such a way. At least I provided sources, not acted in emotional force like you seemed to have. (N0n3up (talk) 20:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC))

Pardon an old fart who forgets how to, and indeed whether to, indent on occasion. It certainly doesn't look as a self reference. (N0n3up (talk) 22:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC))

I took it to be a self reference. "Pardon", as in "pardon me". Anyway, can I suggest that you return to discussing the substance of the issue in question on the article talk page, N0n3up? Cordless Larry (talk) 22:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

I didn't think the article talk page appropriate to my apology if N0n3up thought I was calling him an old fart. Juan Riley (talk) 22:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes, understood. I was just advising N0n3up to return to the article talk page and focus on the issue at hand. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
I think I have had enough of this. Do you understand why, Larry? Juan Riley (talk) 22:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't get you. Do you mean the discussion of the issue, or the posts on your talk page? Cordless Larry (talk) 22:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Repeated ad hominem attacks for just reinstating four simple words that ONE user repeatedly deleted and (a)I did not write (b)are a fact (c)are notable in context (d)other editors reinstated also. Juan Riley (talk) 22:44, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Agreed. N0n3up seems to have been engaged in edit warring at New York City too. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
I am NOT complaining or reporting or informing (that most pernicious of Irish sins were I indeed Irish). Just perhaps learning reality here. And that is not good either. Juan Riley (talk) 22:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
I've tried to encourage them to engage in sensible discussion. Let's see how it goes. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
My bet: (a)it won't go well and (b)I won't be watching what was a surprisingly good article being chipped at. Juan Riley (talk) 23:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Cordless Larry First of all, we seem to have gotten mixed up about everything. When I said "Irish temper" was an expression I used, and second in regards to the edit conflict in the article of New York City, I made a mistake for taking the sources unnoticed which I explained to Castnoot, the user I reverted. (N0n3up (talk) 05:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC))


Have you been stalking on my edits? (N0n3up (talk) 04:30, 8 May 2015 (UTC))

Twas a coincidence...followed a link to France the other day and (as I do these days) looked at recent edits. Saw your edit. I did not revert it tho. Just modified because it left an ambiguous antecedent to an "it" if I recall. Juan Riley (talk) 00:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

It's cool bro ;) (N0n3up (talk) 04:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC))