User talk:Jupeterson

Hello, Jupeterson! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DuncanHill (talk) 17:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

{

ProxyComm

{subst:prodwarning|ProxyComm|concern = Doesn't meet WP:CORP criteria}} DuncanHill (talk) 17:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Kelly Rowland do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 10:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is sourced content

ArbCom-page

The article is not subject to any ArbCom decisions or cases, therefore no enforcement request should be filed. Thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:34, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

K. Michelle

Hello. I'm writing because I saw the messages you left at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement.

I noticed that you haven't posted any messages at Talk:K. Michelle. You seem to be in a dispute with other editors, and you really need to communicate with them. Stop edit-warring and discuss your concerns on the article's Talk page. If discussions are unproductive, follow Wikipedia's WP:Dispute resolution. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:42, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

K. Michelle

Hello. I am simply trying to help with the proper creation of this page. There has been multiple talk discussions going on on this topic from others. The page has been defaced many times, so I felt its best I bring it to an admins attention. Do you guys not care that this is going on? Look at the history of the page.

As I wrote, you seem to be edit-warring. Regardless of whether you are right, you need to stop edit-warring and discuss your differences with the other editors who are in conflict with you. Continuing to edit war, even if you feel you are right, may result in your being blocked. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on K. Michelle. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries like this won't help you. Tune it down. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 05:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kmichelle.jpg

This seems to be a straight-up copyright violation from http://www.vh1.com/shows/love_and_hip_hop_atlanta/cast_member.jhtml?personalityId=15530 . It's not cool to upload images from the internet to commons. Do you have the right to use this file somehow?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 05:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I do have the right to upload it. The right was given to me and is provable. Why do you continue to delete EVERYTHING that gets put on this page? jupeterson (talk)

I didn't delete the last stuff, did I? And I've only ever reverted you once. If you do have the right to the picture, you might want to follow the procedures here: Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials or it'll probably get deleted by a bot. I think it's already on some list. You don't happen to work for the lady, do you?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 20:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No I don't work for the lady. So. Why did you revert me twice. A picture ones and then a bunch of text saying it was promotional material. No, I don't work for the lady. I don't even know her. Do you work for a competitor of hers or have some issue with her? It seems like you and others keep taking stuff off this wikipedia page and are only keeping what you want to keep on the page which doesnt even look like a decent page. Go look at Jay-Z, Beyonce or any other wiki page describing an artist and you'll see a page that its put together with content that is more appealing to the readers eye. Right now this page has one boring paragraph, compared to how I set the page up to look. jupeterson

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jupeterson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have tried talking with the user that keeps undo'ing my edits. This is not working. Have you blocked the other user as well? Because they have undone my posts more times than I have undid their posts.

Decline reason:

Well, actually, it's been several other users, and it's OK for them to do that because, by continuing to revert rather than discuss it with them (save in edit summaries, which is discouraged) your edits ceased to be covered by an assumption of good faith and became vandalism, which anyone can revert as many times as necessary before the vandal stops or is stopped. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.159.204 (talk) 14:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stellar Cyber

The article Stellar Cyber has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Nahal^(T) 08:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stellar Cyber moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Stellar Cyber, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 17:54, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jupeterson. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Stellar Cyber, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Lapablo (talk) 17:56, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Stellar Cyber concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stellar Cyber, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stellar Cyber

Hello, Jupeterson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stellar Cyber".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]