Jump to content

User talk:JustOneDay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JustOneDay (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok I have literally done nothing on this site. Yet I'm blocked? All I ask is a polite why. It's unfair and unjustified. JustOneDay (talk) 16:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is blocked because there was technical evidence that you have abused multiple accounts. Please request an unblock from your original account. Huon (talk) 16:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JustOneDay (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I can't get onto my original account. I had another one set up for me by the name of LouisPhilippeCharlesNew but that was taken away to. Even then the first account I had on here was ages ago and have since forgot the password anyway. User:Huon do you have an email address I can contact you on at all maybe?

Decline reason:

Self admitted block evading sock of blocked user. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:58, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So you haven't "done nothing" but are a banned user trying to evade the block on a previous account. You can contact WP:UTRS to request an unblock via email. Huon (talk) 17:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JustOneDay (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

User:Jpgordon apart from the fact that the account named LouisPhilippeCharlesNew was actually set up for me by an administrator. This account has NOT even been used on here. You can clearly see that on my empty "contribution" list on here. As a result I resent the fact that even having the option to do anything has been taken from me when I have technically done nothing wrong. I only set this account up to upload a total of four paintings on the commons and again did nothing on here. I just don't really understand why a so-called "public" encyclopaedia has almost become a tiny dictatorship run by a few people who have way too much control. It is not fair. I refer to the LPCNew account. I had the option to edit removed from me due to the machinations of a juvenile user by the name of FactStraight and will fight till my dying day to return. Apart from the fact I've made about 400 articles at least I am still actually a person. Namely Thomas Harding. I'm 25, half blind, and had 5 strokes and thus have a large amount of free time on my hands and would be more than happy to focus that time on Wikipedia. As noted. I've made at least 400 articles including entire family lines. But nobody sees those contribution as a valid point of dedication. It's unfair and boarding ridiculous now. I've done little to nothing wrong. I pray the person that reads this realises that I am another person you know with feelings and likes and dislikes. And I dislike being treated as though I'm a protégé of Hitler. I was a darn good editor and have just as much if not more potential to continue to be. Thank you. Please, I pray JustOneDay (talk) 22:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were community banned 2 months ago. Much more time will need to elapse before the community reevaluates your standing. If you want a good chance at being unbanned at a (much) later date, stay away from Wikipedia all together...do not make new accounts. only (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok

[edit]

Ok, fine however User:Only may I have your email address at all?


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JustOneDay (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Considering I actually set up this account to upload two images on the commons (one of which has been deleted despite my saying I made said image I actually did nothing on here to warrant being blocked on here. I have done nothing wrong (again) This is more about the principle for me now. I also think this is kind of a personsl thing on the part of User:Courcelles which is not what Wikipedia is about surely? JustOneDay (talk) 19:21, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Admitted violations of WP:SOCK. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 19:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.