User talk:KRasmussen69

October 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Clivina difformis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Clivina difformis was changed by KRasmussen69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958634 on 2020-10-10T02:39:23+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Neohypodiscus. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Neohypodiscus was changed by KRasmussen69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952675 on 2020-10-10T02:43:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bethel School District (Washington), you may be blocked from editing. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:51, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stadium High School, you may be blocked from editing. Sounder Bruce 02:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tacoma, Washington. General Ization ^Talk 02:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.

Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]