User talk:KalbolHosain
November 2016[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abu Hurairah has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Abu Hurairah was changed by KalbolHosain (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936952 on 2016-11-12T13:10:17+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:10, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abu Hurairah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yinf (talk) 13:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Abu Hurairah, you may be blocked from editing. Yinf (talk) 13:15, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)KalbolHosain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
hello, first thanks to call me a vandal! . I'm just typing to say I have reasons for all of my claims. I forgotted to add source and reference for them. for example abu hurairah is a liar that changed or created! Hadith and I can address this from Sunni and Shia books. you called me vandal , but what about that person who claimed abu hurairah(God damn him!) has said right stuff...
Decline reason:
The claims that you were making in the article require multiple reliable sources due to the nature of the claims. You cannot make unsupported claims that somebody is a liar. Finally, adding the text "God damn him!" after a person's name is almost never appropriate in an article. Please review WP:Reliable sources and explain how, if you're allowed to edit further, your future edits will comply with this policy. —C.Fred (talk) 16:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.