User talk:Karl Vincent D. David

Edits to Don Bosco Tarlac[edit]

Hi, please stop trying to insert the Batch 2005 logo with message on the Don Bosco Tarlac article. Its not appropriate content and its way too large. Its debatable whether the Batch 2005 information is relevant to the article about the school at allo, but I'm trying to work with you to find a way to include a mention of it. Trying to include the inappropriate text and logo isn't helpful. Thanks, Gwernol 16:29, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to ask you again to stop reverting the article to include the animated logo. It is inappropriate. Wikipedia is not a place for you to advertize your graduating class. You should also review Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view which is a central pillar of editing Wikipedia. Finally I'm going to warn you that you are in danger of violating the three revert rule. If you continue to replace the inappropriate image on the Don Bosco Tarlac article you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thanks, Gwernol 16:35, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning do not continue to insert the inappropriate version of the logo into the Don Bosco Tarlac article. If you continue to revert the article you will be in violation of the three revert rule and I will take this to the site administrators. This will likely lead to you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please understand that this is not appropriate content for a Wikipedia article. Thanks, Gwernol 16:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to my talk page[edit]

Hi, I'm afraid I don't speak whatever language that message was left in (Tagalog ? Taglish ?), so I am unable to respond. Sorry. This is the English language Wikipedia so you'll get most mileage from messages left in English. Gwernol 17:00, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

However, that last one was clear and a completely unacceptable use of Wikipedia. You are reminded to remain civil.

Warning: Please do not add obscenities to Wikipedia. Injecting unnecessary profanities, racially or sexually abusive comments, or provocative pictures to articles or user pages offends many people. Wikipedia treats such actions as vandalism and blocks people from editing for such repeated vandalism. Gwernol 17:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I managed to get a translation of some of the Filipino message you left on my talk page, so:

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia and make personal attacks on editors you and your sockpuppet accounts will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thanks, Gwernol 17:08, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Bluepatch05 logo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bluepatch05 logo.gif. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Karl's Portrait.jpg[edit]

Image:Karl's Portrait.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bluepatch05 logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bluepatch05 logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]