User talk:Katherinefuller
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 22:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Univism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —Ceran(Sing) 22:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
You tried to add 'Univism' to this article, but as far as I can tell from a quick google search, there's no such thing. Can you explain what you're trying to do? Maybe I can give you some advice. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
January 2009
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Blue. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PaleAqua (talk) 21:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Possibly, doing this once or twice could be put down to an unintentional mistake. But at 4 to 5 times now, v. hard to avoid the impression you're doing this on purpose. The next unexplained deletion from this acct will result in a block. --cjllw ʘ TALK 23:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)