User talk:Kaylaelyse219

Welcome!

Hello, Kaylaelyse219, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Drown (Young Adult Fiction), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ttonyb (talk) 06:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Drown (Young Adult Fiction)

The article Drown (Young Adult Fiction) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable e-book lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTBOOK.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 06:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Drown (Young Adult Fiction) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drown (Young Adult Fiction) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drown (Young Adult Fiction) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ttonyb (talk) 03:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:19, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Drown (Young Adult Fiction) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Drown (Young Adult Fiction) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/pages/Drown/149290761796396) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:12, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaylaelyse219 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ttonyb (talk) 04:46, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for For abusive sockpuppetry, first offense. Creating multiple accounts is not a legitimate way to prevent the deletion of an article on your book.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jclemens (talk) 20:45, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaylaelyse219 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ttonyb (talk) 15:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been extended to two weeks for continued sockpuppetry. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 16:08, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

um, ill admit to the two sockpuppets before, they were people I knew using my own laptop who tried to help me out. But i don't know who that third person is. i stopped after the first block because I wanted to continue wprking on my article. That person has nothing to do with me. Also, I will admit to a close connection to the book. My sister wrote it; but I can assure you that there is no bias in the article. I tried my hardest to remove myself and my personal opinions from it. If you see any bias, please do point it out and I will edit it away---well once i finally can get on my article.

Stop. You need to read WP guidelines extensively before you do any more editing. The issue is not that you wrote a biased article on a notable subject (the current language is a bit promotional in tone, but you obviously arent saying things like "the best book of the year"). The issue is that there is no indication that it meets notability standards for having an article. Im not what some call a "deletionist", but we really cant have every book get an article just because someone likes it or is connected to it. I struggled for 2 years to collect enough references, and to create supportive articles, for a relative who is notable but not highly so, and who, having passed away, cannot benefit personally from the article being here (neither can i, for that matter, benefit). your conflict of interest makes it impossible to write on this article subject objectively in terms of its notability. I did search for signs of notability, didnt find any. There is no way anyone reading this article, the AFD, your talk page, and the sockpuppetry abuse reports, will not conclude you are editing in bad faith. so just stop doing that. if you want to promote your sisters book, send some print copies to notable independent booksellers (california has some of the last standing), after calling to see if they would like a copy. All you need is a few librarians or booksellers to fall in love with it, and they will sell it like crazy. if no one does, your sister just has to try again. it actually sounds good from your description, and I might even buy a copy. but thats so entirely separate from this project, its barely worth mentioning here. after your ban, if you like, try editing some articles on other YA books, or some other subject, but please dont add your sisters book to lists, articles, etc. seriously, you could get a permanent ban, and how would that help her if the book actually DOES go viral? sincerely, Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:45, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]